Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rintense

I don’t think I insulted myself at all. Please tell me how? I’ve asked all 3 of you for your arguments regarding this incident and all 3 of you just keep hurling insults without any substance.

I gave a logical argument that ya’ll then jumped on and said that we should violate the rules/laws if it appears that they are not being applied equally, without actually having proof to that effect.

I advocate knowing all of the facts before jumping to conclusions and then taking action. However, I only think we should work to change the laws we don’t like; not break them, which makes us just like the libs. Two wrongs don’t make a right.

The laws should only be broken if the laws are oppressive or not representative of the people and the people have no legal recourse to change those laws (as in the England example).

Regardless, I am only stating that the full facts of this situation are not yet known so NOBODY (including me, as I’ve stated before) can draw a conclusion as to fault. I can’t believe that at least 3 freepers disagree with knowing all of the facts before jumping the gun.

I’m called a lib or a troll just because I want to know what actually happened. I don’t take the protester’s story at his own word anymore than I took Gate’s story at his word. According to Gates, the cops discriminated against him. Obummer jump-the-gun and accused the cops of being guilty, without knowing all of the facts. It seems several freepers here are doing the same thing though. I tend to be more cautious because I don’t intend to look like the fool Obummer ended up being. Is that so wrong?


175 posted on 09/17/2009 8:53:33 PM PDT by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: TXDuke
I don’t think I insulted myself at all. Please tell me how?

Let me count the ways....

First: after less than a month here, you "wonder if there is a way of banning" another freeper over a difference of opinion.

Second: you use the lame "First Amendment" argument concerning posting here on FR. (I don't buy the "sarcasm" explanation. It wasn't used in a sarcastic way, and there was no /sarc tag.)

Third: you violate ALL FR decorum by challenging another freeper, a female no less, to a fist fight. (how you are still here is a complete mystery to me. Even in my short time here, I have seen people booted for less. I guess ANYTHING goes here nowdays.)

Fourth: You go on and on and on and on with the whiney-assed posts. Some folks don't agree with you--get over it.

Personally, I have no problem with your argument. I see your point. I see the other side, too. It is a discussion on which freepers (presumably adults) disagree.

It's no big deal. It happens all day, EVERY DAY!

Now, this was meant as a FRiendly explanation. I am reasonably sure that you won't take it as such and want to continue to go on and on. I'm done with it, but I will be watching to see what happens when the Spelling and Grammar Police challenge you. THAT'S GOING TO BE FUN!

187 posted on 09/18/2009 5:23:07 AM PDT by PalmettoMason ("an empty limousine pulled up in front of the White House, and Barack Obama got out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson