More circumlocution, huh? And darlin, you insulted yourself with your posts. I merely poured salt in the wound you opened.
I don’t think I insulted myself at all. Please tell me how? I’ve asked all 3 of you for your arguments regarding this incident and all 3 of you just keep hurling insults without any substance.
I gave a logical argument that ya’ll then jumped on and said that we should violate the rules/laws if it appears that they are not being applied equally, without actually having proof to that effect.
I advocate knowing all of the facts before jumping to conclusions and then taking action. However, I only think we should work to change the laws we don’t like; not break them, which makes us just like the libs. Two wrongs don’t make a right.
The laws should only be broken if the laws are oppressive or not representative of the people and the people have no legal recourse to change those laws (as in the England example).
Regardless, I am only stating that the full facts of this situation are not yet known so NOBODY (including me, as I’ve stated before) can draw a conclusion as to fault. I can’t believe that at least 3 freepers disagree with knowing all of the facts before jumping the gun.
I’m called a lib or a troll just because I want to know what actually happened. I don’t take the protester’s story at his own word anymore than I took Gate’s story at his word. According to Gates, the cops discriminated against him. Obummer jump-the-gun and accused the cops of being guilty, without knowing all of the facts. It seems several freepers here are doing the same thing though. I tend to be more cautious because I don’t intend to look like the fool Obummer ended up being. Is that so wrong?
By the way, if you’re offended that I used a lot of words to fully explain my position then oh well (your circumlocution comment). If I don’t fully explain everything thoroughly, then you jump on me, but if I do explain it thoroughly then you also insult me.
Can you please just provide an argument, any argument, for this debate or are you only capable of providing meaningless insults?
As I’ve said before, I read all of your posts to me and not a single one offered a position or argument or fact for this debate. Do you actually have a position or argument?