To: DecoyJames
If she was in business, she may well have donated to both sides.
Why don’t we judge based on her whole record, not just a tidbit?
11 posted on
09/17/2009 6:41:26 AM PDT by
MortMan
(Stubbing one's toes is a valid (if painful) way of locating furniture in the dark.)
To: MortMan
Helping the enemy is part of what got us in this mess. You cannot be luke warm, hot, cold or vomit is how scripture puts it.
13 posted on
09/17/2009 6:43:14 AM PDT by
wombtotomb
(Equal opportunity does not mean equal OUTCOME!!)
To: MortMan
If she was in business, she may well have donated to both sides.
Wouldn't that then reinforce the idea that she is an opportunist?
20 posted on
09/17/2009 6:45:36 AM PDT by
dmartin
(Not the 'Change' you were 'Hoping' for?)
To: MortMan
Why don’t we judge based on her whole record, not just a tidbit?
^^^^
Yeah, business people sometimes donate to both sides, but the woman donated to the rabid Rahm Emmanuel. Troubling, indeed.
36 posted on
09/17/2009 6:57:26 AM PDT by
Bigg Red
(Palin/Hunter 2012)
To: MortMan
If she was in business, she may well have donated to both sides.Then she should stay in business and out of the Republican party.
61 posted on
09/17/2009 7:37:16 AM PDT by
CharacterCounts
(November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
To: MortMan
If she was in business, she may well have donated to both sides.According to some perfect conservative freepers, you would be considered a liberal or RINO.
Why don’t we judge based on her whole record, not just a tidbit?
Cause "perfect" conservative freepers are always correct, and never EVER get anything wrong. What they say goes, because well their "perfect"
Hypcrites on our side ? .... Never!!! haha
TO ALL: ANY CANDIATE IS BETTER THAN DODD.
To: MortMan
77 posted on
09/17/2009 11:23:33 AM PDT by
bustinchops
(Teddy ("The Hiccup") Kennedy - the original water-boarder)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson