Replies

I'll give her this much, in the thousands of motions, briefs and rulings that I've read, this one is BY FAR the most entertaining court filing, ever. Did anyone not laugh out loud when reading it?

Orly must have lost her internet connection the day her "law school" covered justiciability. It's already been well-established that she missed the class on the subject of the locus standi.

I'll give her this much, in the thousands of motions, briefs and rulings that I've read, this one is BY FAR the most entertaining court filing, ever. Did anyone not laugh out loud when reading it?

I choked on my coffee a few times, yes.

Accusing the court of treason the day after he's threatened you with sanctions for frivolous filings is just ... NOT a good idea.

Accusing a Bush-appointed judge of being subservient to the current Democratic President is ... NOT wise.

On a less hyperbolic note, arguing that the Judge was wrong for dismissing the case (along with the TRO) because local rules grant a "right" to file a response when (a) the local rules do not grant that right and (b) her own motion violates the local rules by exceeding maximum page count and failing to sign it is just ... NOT smart.

Seeking reconsideration of the TRO Order on the grounds that she had no opportunity to file a response to the Motion to Dismiss papers (a completely separate issue) is ... NOT bright.

The list could continue, but - you've already read it, so no need.

Where does she get the idea that it doesn’t matter where Obama was born if his father was a British subject? I guess she’s never bothered to read the 14th Amendment, either.