Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George W. Bush to Conservative Movement: Drop Dead
American Spectator ^ | SEPTEMBER 16, 2009 | W. James Antle, III

Posted on 09/16/2009 9:30:43 AM PDT by RobinMasters

At least that's how the 43rd president is quoted in a new book by one of his speechwriters, as reported by Byron York.

Bush was preparing to give a speech to the annual meeting of the Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC. The conference is the event of the year for conservative activists; Republican politicians are required to appear and offer their praise of the conservative movement.

[Speechless: Tales of a White House Survivor author Matt] Latimer got the assignment to write Bush's speech. Draft in hand, he and a few other writers met with the president in the Oval Office. Bush was decidedly unenthusiastic.

"What is this movement you keep talking about in the speech?" the president asked Latimer.

Latimer explained that he meant the conservative movement -- the movement that gave rise to groups like CPAC.

Bush seemed perplexed. Latimer elaborated a bit more. Then Bush leaned forward, with a point to make.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush43; conservatives; cpac
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 09/16/2009 9:30:43 AM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead; justiceseeker93; traderrob6; OL Hickory; socialismisinsidious; trlambsr; Altera; ...

Ping.


2 posted on 09/16/2009 9:31:41 AM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Sorry. No sale.


3 posted on 09/16/2009 9:32:31 AM PDT by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

BS, pure and simple...


4 posted on 09/16/2009 9:34:14 AM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Bush is not an idiot. He knows that “whupping” Gary Bauer was not a great accomplishment. I very much doubt that this conversation took place.


5 posted on 09/16/2009 9:34:18 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Bush is a politician, just like Obama. “Movements” be they conservative or leftist are just a means to an end: more power.


6 posted on 09/16/2009 9:34:42 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

This “speech writer” has already been revealed for what he is.


7 posted on 09/16/2009 9:34:46 AM PDT by carton253 (Ask me about Throw Away the Scabbard - a Civil War alternate history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

If so... Bush forgets who elected his “ass” to two terms.


8 posted on 09/16/2009 9:34:50 AM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Obviously, all of this should be taken with a pillar of salt. We don't know for a fact that Bush said this.

AS says this but then repeats it.

I am irritated by third level speech writers getting so must attention.

9 posted on 09/16/2009 9:35:37 AM PDT by svcw (Legalism reinforces self-righteousness - it communicates to you the good news of your own goodness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Who knows whether this is true.

But given the guy's decidedly moderate tone in office and his dad's political antipathy towards Reagan its not hard to believe.

Wouldn't make him a bad guy, just not conservative.

10 posted on 09/16/2009 9:35:37 AM PDT by skeeter (Pterocarya fraxinifolia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

Bush’s governance ALONE cemented the FACT he is no conservative.


11 posted on 09/16/2009 9:36:19 AM PDT by Boiling Pots (Barack Obama: The Final Turd George W. Bush laid on America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Russ

The complete disgreard Bush showed to conservatives, in well everything (except invading Iraq) demonstrates that he believed this.

I have no doubt he thought very little of conservatives


12 posted on 09/16/2009 9:36:19 AM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

BS! Not buying this for a second.


13 posted on 09/16/2009 9:37:10 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I don’t need some book to tell me Bush was no conservative. His actions speak for themselves.


14 posted on 09/16/2009 9:38:11 AM PDT by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

This will get him on MSNBC.


15 posted on 09/16/2009 9:38:29 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus (Light from Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

I agree. Eight years of W bashing was plenty. I’m trying to stop myself.


16 posted on 09/16/2009 9:39:29 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Draft in hand, he (Latimer) and a few other writers met with the president in the Oval Office.

It seems nobody from the Bush admin knows who Latimer is.

(On bogus NewsMax Article): First on the Ticker: Bush, Palin aide disputes book claims.

Recher said. "Nobody knows who he is. When people heard he was writing a book the most common reaction has been, 'Who?'"

Bwahaha

17 posted on 09/16/2009 9:39:45 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32

If it’s true, and I doubt it is, I’d respect Bush even more for saying it. We shouldn’t be creating “movements” that are just about cementing power for our side. Leaders should be using political capital to get government out of the people’s lives and take government’s powers away. The democrats are the party that’s only interested in cementing their power. Let’s beat them by being for the people.


18 posted on 09/16/2009 9:40:23 AM PDT by jyoders19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jyoders19

“Leaders should be using political capital to get government out of the people’s lives and take government’s powers away”

Which is the exact opposite of what GWB did.

He used conservative rhetoric and then completely did the opposite


19 posted on 09/16/2009 9:42:15 AM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge
I'm glad that the author of this piece followed up with, "Obviously, all of this should be taken with a pillar of salt". Otherwise I would have had to say BS to him too.
20 posted on 09/16/2009 9:43:11 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson