Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TChris

The “population bomb” scenario overlooked the fact that people naturally stop having so many children as their standard of living and education improves — it makes sense to concentrate on quality over quantity.


2 posted on 09/16/2009 9:05:40 AM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent Design -- "A Wizard Did It")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b

***makes sense to concentrate on quality over quantity.***

Yet the real reason for having many children at that time was that most of them would not make it to adulthood.

Most would die as children. Some would make it to the teen years. One or two might make it to old age and have families.

There is a story about a doctor who went into the jungles somewhere and gave the children innoclulations against diseases.
When he told the tribal elders how this would allow the children to live to old age, they said ....It was good, but who would feed them?


5 posted on 09/16/2009 9:15:57 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (That's reicest you dirty rat dog Reicest you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b

Urbanization is the key factor in decline in population growth. In the early 1960s, the typical Mexican woman had 6.2 children. This figure was down to 2.3 children as Mexican society became more urbanized. Its common sense actually: in the city, there are more diversions. In the country, your diversions are farming and procreation.


16 posted on 09/16/2009 11:19:20 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson