No, I wasn't there and I'm not armchair generaling and second guessing that commanders deliberately made the decisions you claim to save their careers as a statement of FACT, either. That's my point.
Officers didnt want to jeopardize their careers more than they didnt want their men to die.
Entered as a statement of fact- NOT an opinion.
Again, how do you come to your conclusion of stated fact? Are you part of the team that is investigating the incident?
My point is that troops on the ground said that artillery would not endanger civilians and commanders (who weren’t there) ruled otherwise. 4 good Marines died because of that decision.
And now you are reduced to insisting that I made a statement of fact after you said I couldn’t share my opinion unless I was there. Obviously you recognized my statement as opinion first and are now arguing it was presented as fact?
Let me guess, you must be (have been) a commander, right?