My point is that troops on the ground said that artillery would not endanger civilians and commanders (who weren’t there) ruled otherwise. 4 good Marines died because of that decision.
And now you are reduced to insisting that I made a statement of fact after you said I couldn’t share my opinion unless I was there. Obviously you recognized my statement as opinion first and are now arguing it was presented as fact?
Let me guess, you must be (have been) a commander, right?
Project much? Your original statement is written as a conclusion of FACT.
Let me guess, you must be (have been) a commander, right?
Yes.