Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tymesup
"Anybody besides me got a problem with this date? "

Yes, I do, the original trial commencement date was Oct xx, but that was before I heard of this other participant in the trial.....maybe that is the reason for the delay.

125 posted on 09/15/2009 9:48:06 PM PDT by matthew fuller (BHO-Aks not what you can do for your country; Aks only what you can do for ME ME ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: matthew fuller
Yes, I do, the original trial commencement date was Oct xx, but that was before I heard of this other participant in the trial.....maybe that is the reason for the delay.

The Oct 05 date is the date that Judge Carter will rule on the Government's dismissal motion, and if he rejects it, likely order full discovery to begin and that the magistrate judge begin issuing subpoenas for the documents and other items that the parties are even now compiling lists of. (Or more likely have them ready to go!).

The addition of Kreep, as attorney for a couple of the plaintiffs who were formerly represened by Taitz. doesn't change any of that, and was done at the very first hearing, where the trial date was also set, tentatively that is.

152 posted on 09/15/2009 11:08:47 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson