Posted on 09/15/2009 12:02:26 PM PDT by La Lydia
Since the September 11th terrorist attacks on the United States, some have called for a law enforcement response rather than a military one. Monday's U.S. Special Forces raid on Somalia, which killed a suspected terrorist, has raised the issue again. Dan Volman, director of the African Security Research Project, questions the wisdom of the raid.
"I think it's in some ways a real serious mistake and I think it will undermine a lot of the efforts by the United States and other parties to achieve a peaceful resolution or at least some kind of resolution…in Somalia," he says.
He says the raid indicates "the Obama administration remains committed to the global war on terrorism, which I think is a faulty strategy."
Volman says the raid "stigmatizes" the Somali Transitional Federal Government (TFG), making it appear "as an agent of the United States government." He says that may make it more difficult for the TFG to "reach out and create some kind of broad-based government."
"I'm well aware that al-Qaeda is a criminal organization, that it carries out terrible crimes around the world. But I would argue…that al-Qaeda and these kinds of terrorist activities do not directly threaten the vital national security interests of the United States," he says. Instead, he says, they pose a greater threat to the Somalia and other countries around the world...
Volman says terrorist acts should be treated as "terrible" crimes, not as a "military action. Not as a threat to the vital national security interests of the United States."
"Just to give one example…the United States would like to capture al-Qaeda agents. First of all, they could be put on trial, which means that their guilt can be established…. But also so that they can be questioned…. If you simply kill them you lose any possibility of getting any useful information from them."...
We'll kill.
Capiche?
Yup.
How about we send over elements of the US Park Police, and have them pull over everyone in the country; cite’em and drag’em into federal court for speeding or reckless driving?
...so I think what you’re saying is “Foxtrot Oscar, Mr. Big Shot terrorism expert”. If so, I say, “Hear, hear!”
Colonel, USAFR
The world had it right for 1400 years. Our ‘police’ approach is imaginative and already tested and demonstrated as suicidal. The results are ignored. As the Chinese might observe, the West claps with one hand, Islamists with both.
Now they won’t talk if arrested. We aren’t good a trying them and we stand the risk of the being freed in the US with a greencard. Some men just need killin.
We tried a law enforcement approacl to LQ and it got us 911.
Roger that. Transmission recieved correctly.
Apply Sharia Law.
And littering.
The only useful information is typically "Allah Akbar!"
Another Quisling...
Which, of course, means the Obama Administration will love it.
why is Voice of America producing anti-american agitprop?
I wondered that myself. Maybe it’s the new regime.
The current administration won't allow them to be questioned using the means necessary to elicit truthful responses.
Just don't waterboard them!
And make sure the police know how to read Miranda in Somali...
Yes, my vote goes to the “simply kill them” option. As many as we can, as fast as we can. The episode that sparked this “essay” was immensely gratifying to me. The first helicopter blew them to smithereens, the second one swooped in and grabbed the corpse to we could prove it was his.
Oh, poor babies...our analyst is afraid the Somalis will be "stigmatized". I'd rather taze them, bro.
I don’t WANT a “peaceful solution” to terrorism. I want all the terrorists DEAD.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.