Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: webstersII

Her foot has to be down for it to be a foot fault, I believe


55 posted on 09/13/2009 5:23:14 PM PDT by sofaman (To be or not to be is not a question of compromise. Either you be or you don't be. - Golda Meir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: sofaman
Her foot has to be down for it to be a foot fault, I believe

It was down on the line.

67 posted on 09/13/2009 5:37:34 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: sofaman

You are correct. As long as your feet start behind the line, one could jump to within a foot of the net and then hit the serve. If your foot makes contact with the line or beyond it before you make contact with the ball with your racket, then it is a foot fault.

This thing about it being the wrong point of the match to call a foot fault is the craziest argument that I have ever heard. The whole point of the rule is to prevent the server from gaining an unfair advantage, regardless the current state of the match.


92 posted on 09/13/2009 6:14:13 PM PDT by Delta Dawn (The whole truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson