Skip to comments.
PHOTO: Boeing pitches OV-10X Bronco for USAF light attack
Flight Global ^
| September 11, 2009
| Stephen Trimble
Posted on 09/12/2009 12:03:18 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
PHOTO: Boeing pitches OV-10X Bronco for USAF light attack
By Stephen Trimble on September 11, 2009
Boeing confirms it has proposed building new OV-10s with upgraded avionics and weapons for the US Air Force light attack contract.
Subscription-only Inside the Air Force broke the news this morning.
Boeing provided the photo above, providing a glimpse of the new OV-10 concept. The image will surely be embraced by the Bronco's devoted following, who remember the aircraft's notably effective service in the Vietnam War.
The OV-10 could face competition from other Vietnam-era light attack aircraft, such as the Piper Aircraft PA-48 Enforcer. A new class of turboprop fighter-trainers, such as the AT-6 and the Embraer Super Tucano are also vying for the contract. Alenia, meanwhile, plans to offer the jet-powered M346 trainer.
Boeing inherits the OV-10 Bronco's design rights from its purchase in the 1980s of North American Rockwell, the aircraft's original manufacturer.
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aerospace; boeing; ov10; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: pepsionice
deathtrap? After a few were shot down this became the most protected plane that ever flew. It seems the enemy learned if they shot one down, the next airstrike was going to be right on their head. They found out that it’s not a good idea to shoot down the people who select the targets.
21
posted on
09/12/2009 1:17:12 AM PDT
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
OV-10 goes way back for me in 1967 at Nakhon Phanom.
To: American Constitutionalist
ear piercing crowd control suppressor.
It sound like this could result in a class action suit for permanent hearing damage.
23
posted on
09/12/2009 2:28:11 AM PDT
by
chainsaw
(If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free! -- P.J..)
To: pepsionice
24
posted on
09/12/2009 2:34:01 AM PDT
by
myknowledge
(F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
To: SERE_DOC
25
posted on
09/12/2009 3:33:38 AM PDT
by
A.A. Cunningham
(Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
To: ASOC
Concur, the Skyraider would be the perfect fit. Update it with better armor and an ejection seat and it would beat all comers.
26
posted on
09/12/2009 4:00:50 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Socialism enslaves you & kills your soul.)
To: FastCoyote
27
posted on
09/12/2009 4:03:41 AM PDT
by
dljordan
To: sukhoi-30mki
They would have to change the designation. "OV" may have originally meant observation, but in today's nomenclature, it is "Observation, Vertical." If an Observation version of the Osprey were created, it would be "OV-22."
Since OA-10 is already taken by the Warthog, it'd have to be given a new number.
28
posted on
09/12/2009 4:04:13 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Joe Wilson speaks for me.)
To: pepsionice
Well, it is safer than the Kiowa set up. Using helicopters to dive bomb like German Stukas is not the best set up. A standoff and raproachable Bronko can do much better, imo.
29
posted on
09/12/2009 4:19:45 AM PDT
by
JudgemAll
(control freaks, their world & their problem with my gun and my protecting my private party)
To: sukhoi-30mki
The military has gone bat sh** crazy with Bozo at the helm. Why not just build a newer version of the A10, it flies slow enough, has a long loiter time and does one he** of a job for us.
30
posted on
09/12/2009 4:26:45 AM PDT
by
calex59
(FUBO, we want our constitution back and we intend to get it!)
To: Halgr
The problem is liberal lawyers. They are not in the streets getting shot at like cops do and nor are they like soldiers who have no civilian life nor bone in it.
Liberals sit, whine and try to impress with cerealbox degrees and bad drama imitations of daddy and mommy. They cannot achieve nor defend witnesses because they abhor the courage it takes to be one. All they do is moralize and babble and betray.
31
posted on
09/12/2009 4:31:45 AM PDT
by
JudgemAll
(control freaks, their world & their problem with my gun and my protecting my private party)
To: pepsionice
It's fore-runner, the OV-1 Mohawk was nicknamed the "Widowmaker". Loose an engine on takeoff and adios.
On a good note, the wheel bearings of the OV-1 fit the M151 series jeep so if you were prepared to spend $100+ in Class IX funds you could keep it off the 2406 report.
32
posted on
09/12/2009 5:12:22 AM PDT
by
Feckless
(Don't care where he was born. The oath I took said "...all enemies, foreign and domestic".)
To: sukhoi-30mki
33
posted on
09/12/2009 5:14:28 AM PDT
by
Bender2
("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
To: sukhoi-30mki
The OV-10 is a Vietnam-era aircraft. Money would be better used on unmanned attack aircraft like the Predator.
34
posted on
09/12/2009 6:51:55 AM PDT
by
BuffaloJack
(The ACORN REPORT = http://republicans.oversight.house.gov/media/pdfs/20090723ACORNReport.pdf)
To: sukhoi-30mki
It’s asking a lot, but the Air Force generals need to break their addiction to very fast movers and accept that anything with wings is better than nothing in the air. They hated the A-10 from the start.
And Pittsburgh: They can aim anything they like at us, but it’s our guys behind the triggers. And that makes a ton of difference.
35
posted on
09/12/2009 8:50:48 AM PDT
by
DNME
(All your rights end when the next "national emergency" begins!)
To: Yo-Yo
They would have to change the designation. "OV" may have originally meant observation, but in today's nomenclature, it is "Observation, Vertical." If an Observation version of the Osprey were created, it would be "OV-22." Since OA-10 is already taken by the Warthog, it'd have to be given a new number.
Nope. Wrong again as usual. The designation "V" is for STOL/VTOL, so the Bronco could retain it's OV-10 designation thanks to a generous interpretation of STOL.
36
posted on
09/12/2009 10:15:18 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Joe Wilson speaks for me.)
To: SERE_DOC
We got to watch them do the same thing on Parris Island in ‘89. Followed by a simulated strike from a couple of F/A-18s.
37
posted on
09/12/2009 11:06:43 AM PDT
by
real saxophonist
(The fact that you play tuba doesn't make you any less lethal. -USMC bandsman in Iraq)
To: real saxophonist
You went to PI? I was there in ‘67... Fun place! NOT! Saw my first OV10 that November at New River.
38
posted on
09/13/2009 12:27:48 AM PDT
by
dcwusmc
(We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
One of my favorite airplanes. If I were filthy rich, I would own one.
39
posted on
09/26/2009 1:09:00 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
(No man's life, liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in session. I AM JIM THOMPSON)
To: sukhoi-30mki
40
posted on
09/26/2009 1:18:23 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
(No man's life, liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in session. I AM JIM THOMPSON)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson