Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joan Walsh: How can Obama top a great speech? (Slobbering love affair continues)
Salon ^ | September 10, 2009 | Joan Walsh

Posted on 09/11/2009 10:56:24 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

I know some Democrats doubted whether President Obama's healthcare speech to a Joint Session of Congress could be a so-called game-changer. After I wrote my last piece praising his populist stemwinder to the AFL-CIO on Labor Day, I heard from Obama supporters who were tired of inspiring speeches and who wanted action from the president instead. I sympathized.

But if ever a speech was a form of action, it was Obama's Wednesday night.

Let me talk about what he said about the crucial public option a little later. What was most important about Obama's address was his declaration that he won't tolerate any more "lies" or "bogus claims" from the GOP. Yes, he used those terms. And right on cue, he faced a crazy congressional heckler, now-infamous South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson, who was caught by a USA Today camera red-faced, screaming, "You lie!" at our president.

How is it that Obama hasn't faced a single heckler in his own healthcare town halls, but he's not safe from the angry, uninformed mob when he speaks to Congress? The next time you see an Important Republican Leader claim the town-hell hecklers are just fringe elements and bad apples, remind them of Rep. Wilson. (And in the meantime, if you're inclined, give some money to Wilson's Democratic challenger, Rob Miller, who's raised more than $50,000 since Wilson's moment of political flatulence.)

Back to the speech: My only real criticism is I wish he'd found a way to do this two months ago. Obama has never before been so lucid in explaining why reform is crucial. Deflating the notion that we're somehow taking on a new public responsibility, he delivered the factoid I've in fact been looking for these last weeks: Each taxpayer already spends an average of $1,000 a year covering the emergency healthcare costs of uninsured folks. We're paying now, we're just not aware of it. Likewise, I thought this point was crucial: "Put simply, our healthcare problem IS our deficit problem. Nothing else even comes close."

On the issue I care about deeply, and hate to see marginalized even by Obama as merely the cause of progressive Democrats -- the public option -- I think he did fine, for now. Sure, I winced along with David Sirota when he set up a false equivalence between the left and the right on this issue -- because I believe the left is right that the public option is crucial to hold down costs and spur competition, while the right is wrong on the issue, and frequently batsh*t crazy -- but I mostly got over it. I thought Obama sold the plan modestly, but politically astutely, as a form of choice, and I liked the line, "I don't want to put insurance companies out of business, I just want to hold them accountable."

Of course the letter from Sen. Ted Kennedy to Obama, written before but delivered after Kennedy's death, was the climax of a great speech. It let Obama return to his theme that healthcare in this wealthy nation is a moral issue and a matter of social justice. At first I wished Obama had read the whole letter -- read it, it's incredible -- but later I appreciated his restraint, not playing every line for applause (or in the case of the Kennedy family and at minimum Vice President Biden, tears).

Things I liked less: Well, I loved Obama's trying to show up both Democrats and Republicans who voted for both the Iraq war and Bush tax cuts with no thought to the deficit he inherited, but I was not crazy about his firm promise, "I will not sign a plan that adds one dime to our deficit." I'm not sure he can keep that promise, for one thing, and it's not a pledge he makes when asking for more money for Afghanistan, or for the not terribly stimulative tax cut he included in the stimulus bill.

But that's a relative quibble. My real question is this: Will Obama follow up this speech with political muscle? I thrilled to reports that White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel demanded an apology from rowdy Rep. Joe Wilson -- and got it. I look forward to the day a similar story is leaked about the way Emanuel dealt with House Blue Dogs like Arkansas Rep. Mike Ross, who says he won't vote for a bill with the public option, or Senate "Gang of Six" members Max Baucus and Kent Conrad.

The fact is, Republicans are mostly irrelevant now. President Olympia Snowe -- I don't remember electing her, but whatever -- can claim the answer to the impasse is a public option "trigger" that kicks in when it's clear private insurance companies can't/won't reform and compete. But we all know we're past that point already, even if Snowe claims not to. Obama said the insurance "exchange" within which the public option will be a "choice" won't kick in for four years anyway; Snowe has suggested the public option "trigger" might kick in after five years. Do they think we're stupid? Even with a second term, former President Obama would be writing his memoirs and picking out furniture at his library before a trigger might take effect. Sasha and Malia would be adults. Why would Democrats -- the majority in both Houses -- go along with such an impotent plan?

Because they're Democrats? I hope not. But we all have to admit that the majority party has accomplished little since they took congressional power in 2006, and only a little more since Obama took office nine months ago. For Obama, leadership now requires showing some muscle, becoming the Blue Dog Whisperer, and getting votes for his healthcare reform plan, not merely making speeches. The president must realize his party colleagues are the ones who can save or sabotage his presidency, and act accordingly. After Wednesday night's speech, I have some faith that he will.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; congress; democrats; healthcare; joewilson; obama; obamacare; socializedmedicine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
"How is it that Obama hasn't faced a single heckler in his own healthcare town halls, but he's not safe from the angry, uninformed mob when he speaks to Congress?"

Uh, because he can't hand-pick congressional representatives like he does his town hall attendees (yet)?

1 posted on 09/11/2009 10:56:25 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Three words. Get a room!


2 posted on 09/11/2009 11:00:26 PM PDT by fhayek (You may assume sarcasm in all my posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Joan Walsh: How can Obama top a great speech?

Well, he'd have to give one first, wouldn't he?

3 posted on 09/11/2009 11:01:50 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Oh, ick! You actually watched it? You are far braver than I am. I know “My civic duty and all”, but I was pretty sure I wouldn’t be able to stop yelling at the T.V... :(


4 posted on 09/11/2009 11:02:23 PM PDT by Sarah 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Only question is, did she write this before or after the speech? Hey Mediots, we don’t need you anymore.

When 2 kids can bring down an 8 $Billion crime syndicate, who needs Old Media?

Pray for the March


5 posted on 09/11/2009 11:07:20 PM PDT by bray (He's a Divider not a Uniter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet


6 posted on 09/11/2009 11:13:07 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I know some Democrats doubted whether President Obama's healthcare speech to a Joint Session of Congress could be a so-called game-changer.

They were correct. If you bet money, pay them already. How can a speech be a "game changer" if he's given the exact same one 115 times so far this year?

The only game changing moment is that Republicans seemed to grow a spine for 3 seconds before apologizing profusely. Oh. And now everyone knows that President Obama is a liar.
7 posted on 09/11/2009 11:16:31 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Why buy health insurance at all if you can't be turned down for any pre-existing conditions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I wished Obama had read the whole letter

Yes. If Obama has a problem, it's that he doesn't talk enough. My 320 gigabyte MP3 player containing his speeches is barely half full.
8 posted on 09/11/2009 11:21:47 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Why buy health insurance at all if you can't be turned down for any pre-existing conditions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why post this crap?


9 posted on 09/11/2009 11:39:15 PM PDT by no dems (GOP Ticket for 2012: Sarah Palin and a Conservative Male with a Hispanic surname.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I find it incredible that these people in the media are able to function. What with their lips pressed so firmly against Obama’s A$$.
10 posted on 09/12/2009 12:34:14 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Was an Intelligence Analyst for Army Intelligence. Served in Korea in 1978-79 at Special Troops, I Corps (ROK/US) Group G-2 and 1981-82 at Headquarters Company, 102nd Military Intelligence (MI) Battalion (Bn.)(CEWI), 2nd Infantry Division. Also stationed at Ft Hood (191st Combat Intelligence Company, 312th MI Bn. (CEWI), 1st Cavalry Division) and Ft Polk (Headquarters Company, 105th MI Bn. (CEWI), 5th Mechanized Infantry Division).

Old habits die hard...

11 posted on 09/12/2009 1:57:20 AM PDT by x_plus_one (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: no dems

I agree- Why post this crap?


12 posted on 09/12/2009 3:20:10 AM PDT by bt-99 ("its not ours to give")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wipe your chin, Joanie.


13 posted on 09/12/2009 3:57:40 AM PDT by GodBlessRonaldReagan (Refugee from the World of Doomed Olsens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

shes going to need a room on election night when the adults sweep the kos kiddies out of congress.


14 posted on 09/12/2009 4:25:57 AM PDT by reefdiver (So how's that HOPE & CHANGE working out for ya ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Why post this crap?

For the same reason that during WWII US civil defense authorities passed out "spotter cards" containing silhouettes of enemy aircraft, to assist Americans in identifying the enemy...

15 posted on 09/12/2009 4:38:14 AM PDT by Zeppo (Save the cheerleader, save the world...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Some party hack decreed that the people
had lost the government’s confidence
and could only regain it with redoubled effort.
If that is the case, would it not be be simpler,
If the government simply dissolved the people
And elected another?

—Bertolt Brecht


16 posted on 09/12/2009 4:51:13 AM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reefdiver

Yeah, a room with a good sturdy closet hanger rod.


17 posted on 09/12/2009 5:12:54 AM PDT by CalvaryJohn (What is keeping that damned asteroid?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bt-99

I believe Sun Tzu would approve of staying informed of the Enemy’s movements.


18 posted on 09/12/2009 5:14:49 AM PDT by CalvaryJohn (What is keeping that damned asteroid?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GodBlessRonaldReagan

“The fact is, Republicans are mostly irrelevant now.” —Joan Walsch

No, Joan, the real fact is that most newspapers, online garbage dumps, NPR, and ABC-CNN-NBC-CBS are irrelevant.


19 posted on 09/12/2009 5:19:26 AM PDT by Sparko (Obama & Czars: neutering the American Voter, perverting the Constitution, all on our dime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Other than her reference to the patriot Joe Wilson, this review could have been (and likely was) written a month ago.


20 posted on 09/12/2009 7:59:34 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson