Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/11/2009 8:00:41 PM PDT by GoldStandard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: GoldStandard

and I want a new pony too.


2 posted on 09/11/2009 8:02:47 PM PDT by BAW (NO, NO, a Trillion Times NO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard

Has nobody told this simple old cadaver George McGovern that medicare is due to go bankrupt around 2017? That’s only 8 years from now. There’s no scumbag worse than an old scumbag.


3 posted on 09/11/2009 8:03:12 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard

TEDDY KEGGER went OUt of STATE to get his Medical CARE. I GUESS MA’s ROMNEYCARE isn’t good enough for old KEGGER.


4 posted on 09/11/2009 8:04:27 PM PDT by gwilhelm56 (If Policy disagreement is RACISM, You are NOT READY to have a MINORITY as President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard

That is simple. How about social security for all? Why should any of us work? We can jsut buy everything imported and hire illegals.


5 posted on 09/11/2009 8:04:39 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Socialist Conservatives: "'Big government is free because tax cuts pay for it'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard

Well, that’s something to think about. Unfortunately Medicare is going broke. But, if you think about it, a bureaucracy is already in place to administer Medicare. We would still need big tax increases to pay for it all, if instead of the “public option”, anyone could just sign up for Medicare.


6 posted on 09/11/2009 8:05:20 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard

Medicare pays 65 cents on the dollar. It can do that because everyone else picks up the other 35 cents. It is called cost shifting. If everyone has Medicare, who pays the rest? Answer: no one. We ration.


8 posted on 09/11/2009 8:05:38 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard

That is pretty simple.

Let’s see. In 2006 (the most recent year I have data on) we budgeted $345B for Medicare. Add to that the premiums paid by individuals, and the copays they paid at the time of service.

Divide that number by the number of persons receiving Medicare. Then weight that number down by some value less than 1 (say .5) to reflect the fact that the present Medicare population is made up of elderly who are higher than average consumer of healthcare (as opposed to those less than 35).

Now multiply by 304 million. That’s the annual cost of Medicare for everyone.

Oh, yeah, then inflate by the difference in medical costs relative to 2006.


9 posted on 09/11/2009 8:07:44 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard

“and my taxes pay all the bills”

And that’s a lie.

Other peoples taxes pay your bills.

Its the old something for nothing. Of course it is “wonderful” for you. It isn’t so wonderful for everyone else paying your bills.

It is pyramid scheme that depends on the base being ever larger than those above the base who are on the receiving end. And the simple fact of the matter is the base is shrinking relative to the those on the receiving end.


10 posted on 09/11/2009 8:09:21 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard

Stupid idea.

Instead we need to abolish Medicare.


11 posted on 09/11/2009 8:09:22 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard

I’ve always wondered why this hasn’t been proposed.


13 posted on 09/11/2009 8:10:17 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Obamacare is "Shovel Ready".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard
Do we also get a government job and a full retirement income.
14 posted on 09/11/2009 8:10:24 PM PDT by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard
From the SUMMARY OF THE 2009 ANNUAL REPORTS--Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees

"Medicare's financial status is much worse. As was true in 2008, Medicare's Hospital Insurance (HI) Trust Fund is expected to pay out more in hospital benefits and other expenditures this year than it receives in taxes and other dedicated revenues. The difference will be made up by redeeming trust fund assets. Growing annual deficits are projected to exhaust HI reserves in 2017, after which the percentage of scheduled benefits payable from tax income would decline from 81 percent in 2017 to about 50 percent in 2035 and 30 percent in 2080. In addition, the Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance (SMI) Trust Fund that pays for physician services and the prescription drug benefit will continue to require general revenue financing and charges on beneficiaries that grow substantially faster than the economy and beneficiary incomes over time."

"As we reported last year, Medicare's financial difficulties come sooner—and are much more severe—than those confronting Social Security. While both programs face demographic challenges, rapidly growing health care costs also affect Medicare. Underlying health care costs per enrollee are projected to rise faster than the earnings per worker on which payroll taxes and Social Security benefits are based. As a result, while Medicare's annual costs were 3.2 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2008, or about three quarters of Social Security's, they are projected to surpass Social Security expenditures in 2028 and reach 11.4 percent of GDP in 2083.

"The projected exhaustion of the HI Trust Fund within the next eight years is an urgent concern. Congressional action will be necessary to ensure uninterrupted provision of HI services to beneficiaries. Correcting the financial imbalance for the HI Trust Fund—even in the short range alone—will require substantial changes to program income and/or expenditures.

Part B of the Supplementary Medical Insurance (SMI) Trust Fund, which pays doctors' bills and other outpatient expenses, and Part D, which pays for access to prescription drug coverage, are both projected to remain adequately financed into the indefinite future because current law automatically provides financing each year to meet next year's expected costs. However, expected steep cost increases will result in rapidly growing general revenue financing needs-projected to rise from 1.3 percent of GDP in 2008 to about 4.7 percent in 2083-as well as substantial increases over time in beneficiary premium charges."

It is expected that about one quarter of Part B enrollees will be subject to unusually large premium increases in the next two years. This occurs because it is projected that the other three-quarters of Part B enrollees will not be subject to premium increases in those years due to low projected Social Security benefit COLAs and a "hold-harmless" provision of current law that limits premium increases to the increase in Social Security benefits.

"This year's Medicare Trustees Report is the fourth consecutive report in which the annual general revenue funding contribution to total Medicare expenditures is projected to exceed 45 percent within the first seven years of the 75-year projection period. The current projection is that the threshold will be reached in 2014, the same as reported last year. This result triggers another "Medicare funding warning."

15 posted on 09/11/2009 8:11:00 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard
George S. McGovern

Another Communist !

16 posted on 09/11/2009 8:11:37 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard
Well, if you'll change the name to the same one as the bankrupt Medicare system, then it's all OK. Pass the same bill but with a different name and everyone will be happy to become property.

Here's an idea, read one of the several dozen proposals republicans have presented in the past 12 years before you argue that it’s all a matter of what they call the pig. Remember never let a good crisis go to waste? If they don't pass Obamacare, they're going to add death panels and limitations to Medicare. Control is their goal, get it? What you want for your children doesn't matter to them any more than do 4000 abortions a day or your grandma. You should start worrying about whether your children will grow up as citizens or slaves, not about why they don’t have cradle to grave taxpayer funded medical care.

have a nice day

17 posted on 09/11/2009 8:12:15 PM PDT by Rashputin (blif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard

Yeah, a fed entitlement now spending well over 1000% of it original promise, going broke, with an admitted $500 billion in fraud and waste. Let’s extend it to everyone. That will work. Yeah, that’s the ticket!


18 posted on 09/11/2009 8:12:16 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard
Do not post commie propaganda on FR.
19 posted on 09/11/2009 8:12:29 PM PDT by roses of sharon (If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever. - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard

Considering that everyone has been complaining about Social Security and Medicare regarding how these programs are designed, operate and associated costs for the longest time. In the last several years the same political class and “Friends of Government” have been telling use how messed up the programs are and that they can not repair them without more money. Well I suggest that they fix these two programs first then get back to us. Further, this useful idiot McCain type should go to “U.S. Debt Clock” and review Unfunded Liabilities at the bottom.

http://www.usdebtclock.org/


21 posted on 09/11/2009 8:14:08 PM PDT by ntmxx (I am not so sure about this misdirection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard

I can remember when McGovern said the solution to hard economic times was wage/price controls. I imagine he was a good history professor, but common sense is not his forte.


22 posted on 09/11/2009 8:14:36 PM PDT by freespirited (Liberals are only liberal about sex & drugs. Otherwise, they want to control your life. --DHorowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard

I need a new truck. Can I trade my health care in for a new truck instead? Ford. I don’t want no obama motors.


23 posted on 09/11/2009 8:14:41 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldStandard

It’s simple, national bankruptcy! And death panels! Two for the price of one!


24 posted on 09/11/2009 8:14:55 PM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson