[ColdWater]

I am not referring to your ‘observation’. I am referring to your #63 where you falsely posted how I responded to your first post to me. I have repeatedly posted the exact sequence which refutes your chronology but you have never addressed your error.

[conimbricenses]

Your first response to me was at the beginning of the thread, and I ignored it because it conveyed that you had a counterproductive agenda. Later interaction with you has completely validated that initial observation. In reviewing 63, I see nothing factually wrong to correct. Your own "chronology" reveals that the succession of our present exchange followed from my quoted statement in 47, which was the first response I made to anything you said. During the course of that exchange you subsequently misidentified me as another poster and personally maligned me for his statements, which also did not merit the hostile response you gave them.

You are obviously an individual with issues, ColdWater. Among them seem to be the characteristics of hypersensitivity to criticism - even when merited, general incorrigibility for your own wrongs, and a bizarre need to get the last word on everything. Though you remain mildly amusing, you have ultimately come to bore me with your antics.