Interesting. I have pointed out and documented a factual error in your #63 and you still deny it. You don’t offer refute my documentation, just denial. Amazing.
That’s because there is nothing factually erroneous with making a correct and valid observation about your motive and behavior. There is something factually erroneous with mischaracterizing a valid observation as an “attack” though, and you did exactly that post hoc once you realized you had maligned me after I called you out.