I guess I have to post the record again. It is clear that you attacked me first.
Me: #3: Not exactly breaking news.
You: #47: And ACORN is suddenly timely again in the news. The more it is publicized the better. Simply knowing about it before the election means very little if it is not common knowledge for the public, and Obama’s ACORN involvement is not presently common knowledge.
Me: #49: Where is it in the news? You cite: “multiple news sources 1982-1994”
You: #51: Right here. http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=ACORN You seem strangely preoccupied with proving to people that you personally knew about Obama’s ACORN affiliations a year ago, even though it is not common knowledge in the general public.
You came to this thread in a state of hypersensitive agitation and preoccupation with matters that entirely miss the point. That state also led you into making genuine personal attacks on a mistaken premise of your own doing, and remains the case as you incorrigibly shirk any responsibility for the way you impugned the character of others. Once again, if that is the case with you there is nothing further I can say or do to help you.