Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McLaren unveils new MP4-12C, the 'affordable' supercar to challenge Ferrari and Lamborghini
The Times ^ | 9/9/2009 | Arion McNicoll

Posted on 09/09/2009 9:05:52 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

McLaren unveiled its new supercar today, a 240mph machine which has been dubbed the ‘F1 car for the road’.

The fluidly-styled, gull-winged car is part of an aggressive strategy of expansion for the British racing specialist, which aims to challenge the dominance of Lamborghini and Ferrari.

The MP4-12C, known until now only by its codename P11, is scheduled to go on sale in 2011. It will feature many technical innovations gleaned from the company’s racing division, but is intended as a 200mph-plus ‘affordable’ supercar for everyday use. At around £150,000, it will cost more than a Porsche Turbo and a bit less than a comparable Ferrari.

To make the car more useful day to day, the self-adjusting suspension varies the damper settings to ensure a soft ride for urban driving, then stiffens up to improve driving dynamics and handling as speeds increase. It is powered by an enormous 3.8 litre V8 twin turbo engine which develops 600bhp. The two-seater will accelerate from 0 to 60mph in just 3.4 seconds.

The new McLaren will be put together at the company's factory in Woking, Surrey. In an interview with the Sunday Times, McLaren boss Ron Dennis outlined his intention to create a global supercar brand with a stable of high-performance models. Dennis revealed plans to build three new models over the next six years, eventually producing 4,000 cars a year (Ferrari makes about 6,000). “We’re building more than one car; we’re building a brand,” he says.

The new McLaren uses lightweight aluminium and carbon fibre, which allows for greater performance, while minimising weight. McLaren claims that the average fuel consumption will hover around 22mpg, which is not hugely impressive, but emissions of carbon dioxide are expected to be below 300g/km.

McLaren hopes to sell 1,000 in the first

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 09/09/2009 9:05:52 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Me Like.
Me like mucho.
2 posted on 09/09/2009 9:14:11 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Straighten the front wheels, paint the headlamp covers red, and it looks like one of those novelty cars styled to look like it's traveling in the opposite direction it really is.

3 posted on 09/09/2009 9:17:19 PM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Always nice to see another car on the market that I can’t afford.


4 posted on 09/09/2009 9:28:52 PM PDT by Nachoman (Think of life as an adventure you don't survive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

McLaren bump. gotta love it.


5 posted on 09/09/2009 9:36:01 PM PDT by the crow (typical and bitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

“enormous 3.8 litre V8 twin turbo engine”

Uh, that’s “enormous” now?


6 posted on 09/09/2009 9:39:42 PM PDT by TWohlford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

7 posted on 09/09/2009 9:42:10 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

I’d have to see how this car performs against a Z06 Corvette before I say anything about the performance:price ratio.


8 posted on 09/09/2009 9:42:49 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
McLaren claims that the average fuel consumption will hover around 22mpg, which is not hugely impressive, but emissions of carbon dioxide are expected to be below 300g/km.

Yes, I always worry about fuel consumption and CO2 emissions when I buy my supercars. In fact, it's the very first thing I check when I walk into the showroom.

9 posted on 09/09/2009 9:44:34 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford

About 228 cubic inches for us who still think in “real” units, not some sissified CGS or SI bosh. “Enormous” — don’t make me laugh.


10 posted on 09/09/2009 9:45:58 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
2010 Nissan GT-R Supercar from $80,790:


11 posted on 09/09/2009 9:47:00 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $1 million for Sarah Palin if she runs; What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman

If it is british .. I will NEVER own it no matter what my financial status is. I spent 15 years of misguided youth with British Leyland products.

They taught me perseverance, they taught me that Lucas electrics knew nothing about electricity, they taught me the dangers of seeking out and finding joy and ecstacy, only to be dumped in the cesspool of automotive hell for months. They taugh me budgeting and financial lessons, proving that no matter how much I tried budgeting in preparation of a monetary disaster, I could never never stay on top of it.

British Leyland broke my heart and my patience and my wallet and any desire to ever own anything British again. No wonder those people can keep a stiff upper lip .. they were taught well by their automotive disasters.


12 posted on 09/09/2009 9:50:47 PM PDT by HiramQuick (work harder ... welfare recipients depend on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

I want a small, daringly designed 4-cylinder 2-seater for $25,000. It is feasible. Perhaps Hyundai will do it.


13 posted on 09/09/2009 9:55:07 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiramQuick

I learned vicariously through my brother’s experience with his Triumph Spitfire, aka, the garage mechanic’s companion.


14 posted on 09/09/2009 9:58:46 PM PDT by Nachoman (Think of life as an adventure you don't survive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Back in high school, a friend’s dad bought a prototype car from a developer that was going out of business. I believe they had put over $200k into the build (in the 80s) and he was able to get it for about 10% of that. It was called The Spirit and had a beefed up mid-mounted 351 Cleveland in it and fat tires on an aliminum frame with a fiberglass body. The car sat so low to the ground that the rearview mirror was mounted on the top of the roof and there was a plexiglass porthole in the roof for the driver to see what he was leaving in the dust. My friend’s older brother got to drive it and said he broke the tires loose without clutching while doing about 55 on the road. It was an amazing ride. Never found out what eventually became of it.

No real point to my tale, just wanted to share.


15 posted on 09/09/2009 10:46:05 PM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HiramQuick

Bosche electrical systems will make you yearn for the reliability of Lucas, just ask any VW owner.


16 posted on 09/10/2009 12:06:47 AM PDT by Boiler Plate ("Why be difficult, when with just a little more work, you can be impossible" Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman

I like that “garage mechanics companion” lol And yes I owned a spitfire. Please excuse me ... I was and maybe still am a slow leaner. I later bought a TR5 and a TR7 as well .... I had convinced myself tht after the Spitfire, any type of change would be for the better.

NOPE ... turned out the spitfire was more reliable than the TR5 AND the TR7 together. The idioocy of youth.


17 posted on 09/10/2009 3:11:25 AM PDT by HiramQuick (work harder ... welfare recipients depend on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman

I like that “garage mechanics companion” lol And yes I owned a spitfire. Please excuse me ... I was and maybe still am a slow leaner. I later bought a TR5 and a TR7 as well .... I had convinced myself tht after the Spitfire, any type of change would be for the better.

NOPE ... turned out the spitfire was more reliable than the TR5 AND the TR7 together. The idioocy of youth.


18 posted on 09/10/2009 3:11:39 AM PDT by HiramQuick (work harder ... welfare recipients depend on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: the crow
sweeet...
19 posted on 09/10/2009 3:48:03 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist -ww- I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
It is powered by an enormous 3.8 liter V8 twin turbo engine

Isn't that only 231 cubic inches? That's enormous???

20 posted on 09/10/2009 7:40:52 AM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson