1 posted on
09/08/2009 5:30:03 PM PDT by
Kaslin
To: bareford101; BerniesFriend; blaveda; Bookwoman; Celeste732; dsc; FrdmLvr; FreedomPoster; ...
2 posted on
09/08/2009 5:31:33 PM PDT by
Kaslin
(Acronym for 0bama: One Big Ass Mistake America)
To: Kaslin
“Sun-Caused Warming” - What a dullard I am - now it all makes sense!/sarc
3 posted on
09/08/2009 5:35:51 PM PDT by
Apercu
("A man's character is his fate" - Heraclitus)
To: Kaslin
The Aug. 28 issue of the journal Science details how the scientific team led by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), using a century's worth of data and three powerful computer models, figured out just how small changes in solar activity can trigger great changes in earth's climate. The key is that they're using reliable data collected over a century for their modeling, and they aren't trying to make Big-A projections from Big-A assumptions about data derived from sources whose accuracy and error ranges are impossible to calculate accurately. Their modeling is limited in scope to trying to understand the chemistry of our atmosphere and how that chemistry is affected by solar activity.
As I try and explain to people all the time - our atmosphere's chemistry is so poorly understood that climate prediction models in favor of global warming that use human carbon emissions as the cause are based on a simplified model that has the conclusion of carbon emission based global warming built-in to the model. In other words, the models are fixed to produce the predicted result.
5 posted on
09/08/2009 5:41:35 PM PDT by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: Kaslin
The Aug. 28 issue of the journal Science details how the scientific team led by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), using a century's worth of data and three powerful computer models, figured out just how small changes in solar activity can trigger great changes in earth's climate. The key is that they're using reliable data collected over a century for their modeling, and they aren't trying to make Big-A projections from Big-A assumptions about data derived from sources whose accuracy and error ranges are impossible to calculate accurately. Their modeling is limited in scope to trying to understand the chemistry of our atmosphere and how that chemistry is affected by solar activity.
As I try and explain to people all the time - our atmosphere's chemistry is so poorly understood that climate prediction models in favor of global warming that use human carbon emissions as the cause are based on a simplified model that has the conclusion of carbon emission based global warming built-in to the model. In other words, the models are fixed to produce the predicted result.
6 posted on
09/08/2009 5:42:14 PM PDT by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: Kaslin
How much money can Algore raise by getting credits for claiming he can change the spots on the Sun?
7 posted on
09/08/2009 5:44:09 PM PDT by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
To: Normandy; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; TenthAmendmentChampion; Horusra; Delacon; Entrepreneur; ..
11 posted on
09/08/2009 5:53:08 PM PDT by
steelyourfaith
("Power is not alluring to pure minds." - Thomas Jefferson)
To: Kaslin
The slight increase in solar energy in the peak production of sunspots is absorbed by stratospheric ozone, warming the air in the tropics where sunlight is most intense. The additional energy also helps produce more ozone that absorbs even more solar energy.So, OZONE is one of the culprits! Bring back the CFCs.
To: Kaslin
13 posted on
09/08/2009 6:21:48 PM PDT by
PugetSoundSoldier
(Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the Defense of the Indefensible)
To: Kaslin
I suppose the master plan but the loons will be to shoot icebergs into the sun.
15 posted on
09/08/2009 7:24:40 PM PDT by
BuffaloJack
(Obama's New New Deal = The Raw Deal)
To: Kaslin
17 posted on
09/08/2009 7:48:00 PM PDT by
montyspython
("I don't believe in 'no win' scenarios." - James T. Kirk)
To: Kaslin
I’m sure Obama will appoint a sun czar to figure out how to avoid this crisis by taxing sunspots.
18 posted on
09/08/2009 7:48:12 PM PDT by
Jabrown
To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
We've had a flurry of these. Uh, if you'll pardon the metaphor.
19 posted on
09/08/2009 7:49:34 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: Kaslin
I guess we should come up with a weapon that can damage the sun in order to prevent the destruction of the planet. /s
23 posted on
09/08/2009 8:38:39 PM PDT by
NotSoModerate
(Report dissenters to snitch@whitehouse.gov for a $4,500 tax credit)
To: Kaslin
Sun-Caused WarmingDog-caused manbiting!
To: Kaslin
I had a feeling the sun might be involved but I could just never prove it.
To: Kaslin
Anyone memo’d this to Gore and the other moronic global warming idiots?
27 posted on
09/09/2009 3:10:38 AM PDT by
cranked
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson