Posted on 09/08/2009 3:42:57 PM PDT by Moseley
This ABC News Video broadcast live on 9/11 proves that WTC 7, World Trade Center Building 7, was damaged by falling debris from the collapse of the WTC Twin Towers.
There is a huge controversy over the cause of the collapse of WTC Bldb 7, whether from the terrorist attack or from a government conspiracy with Dick Cheney, Larry Silverstein or the Mossad.
Investigators report that WTC7 was massively damaged by the collapse of the twin towers, on the lower floors.
This video DOES NOT show the lower floors through the smoke, where the severe damage was reported by firefighters.
However, this does provide absolute proof that SOME debris DID hit Building 7, near the top of the structure. Damage to the top floors, on the corner nearest to the camera POV, is unmistakable.
That damage is obviously not enough to cause failure of the building. However, this proves that debris DID travel far enough to damage WTC7. Debris falling in an arc would fall father away from the base before hitting the lower floors of WTC7.
SO this is dramatic confirmation that the accounts of damage to WTC Building 7 is entirely plausible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sW5TRGcJnAk
Let’s see. He was wrong about termite being used in welding. He was wrong about the insurance. He was wrong about other steel structured buildings collapsing. He was wrong about the Enron documents.. etc, etc.. Was there anything he was right about? And he lectured us?
You’re being “conservative”. The planes were 757s.
As an engineer (but not knowing much about the design), watching it happen that day, I was worried the buildings would fall over from the impact - what a cantilever that was and a pretty big moment.
“They falsely mention that the entire nose of the plane was made out of titanium.”
So in that stupid film they mention Ti?
Incidentally, imagine if they thought it was made of magnesium!
Ask yourself: WHY and WHAT SENSE does it make to believe that 7WTC was purposefully destroyed rather than damaged by the flaming debris that landed on it en masse?
It does NOT make sense to believe that it was anything other than the fiery rubble that cascaded down onto it.
You can go ‘truther’ elsewhere.
I hear tell that DemUn is looking for a few good morons.
Also keep in mind that there was that bridge that was destroyed by a simple little tanker truck fire.
And it didn’t melt the steel.
So you and Rosie O can stuff it!
No, you and the truthers are.
Tell us, do you also believe that there are no terrorists?
“Oh, no! You disagree with me! You’re one of the BIGGEST trolls that Free Republic has! You dared to disagree with the Truther libtards; you have to be a troll! You’re so eeeeeeeeevil”
(/you)
People in my office watched the plane hit the Pentagon, and we’ve got millions of muslim and communist extremists and you ranting about how it was all fake. You make me sick.
You’ve been tracking him for years? Well, I can’t say I ever wasted my life like that, but I have encountered mnehring many times. I may disagree with him on occasion, but the notion he’s a troll is downright silly.
Darn it, I need to try harder...
LOL! I was joking and mnehring knows that. He’s a great guy.
Your $20 is in the mail.. thank you for your advertising services.
“Darn it, I need to try harder...”
Oh yeah, I’ve seen real trolls, you suck at it ;-)
The truthers are dead, darks..I could not believe their ignorance.
Some people are more comfortable with conspiracy theories than with truth from reputable sources..
Oops. I assume that my #171 means that I won’t get the $20.
You are kidding, right? Mnehring has been a loyal Freeper for as long as I can remember, and while he doesn't need me to defend him, I will anyway. You sir, on the other hand, are a nut-job, kook, flake, weird, and just plain creepy.
Most other steel buildings are steel-reinforced concrete, with the concrete shielding the steel. Most concrete buildings don’t have 47 floors above the fire, like WTC 7 did. Most buildings do not store thousands of gallons of fuel, like WTC 7 did. But steel buildings have collapsed due to fire. Most concrete buildings do not use the WTC’s extremely rare “tube-in-a-tube” design. This is not a coincidence; These are oddities about the WTC which Al Qaeda learned thanks to the Clinton administration’s manner of prosecuting the WTC bombers of 1993.
Due to the unique structure of the tower, the shape of the collapse was exactly predictable.
But the basic assertion that steel buildings have never collapsed due to fire is simply wrong. Witness Dogwood Elementary School, McCormick Center in Chicago, the Sight and South Theater in Philadelphia, and, fueled by burning asphalt, several bridges.
You may be a realist, but you also are accepting lies from anti-American radicals at face value.
I guess, it is like another freeper said a long time ago: When does wishful thinking become a self-serving lie?
LOL at both of you!
National Geographic is a comic book.
Their support of the “feathered Dinosaur” fraud showed what they are.
I didn’t flunk chemistry either.
Oil, coal or natural gas. Regardless of what they use, it is fed air under pressure to optimize the combustion. The key to the process is the furnace that contains the heat.
I know.
It’s disgusting that there are people who are more comfortable believing we attacked ourselves rather than there being hate filled savages out there who hate us.
But, that’s truthers in a nutshell.
They never see the contradiction when they turn around and state that we deserved it because we’re hated.
It’s a sign of diseased thinking, a masochistic self loathing writ large and projected large.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.