Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pantera

I don’t recall any national president being head of the UN Security Council. Wouldn’t this require Senate confirmation?


24 posted on 09/08/2009 3:20:08 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Great RJ
I don’t recall any national president being head of the UN Security Council. Wouldn’t this require Senate confirmation?

That is an interesting thought!

26 posted on 09/08/2009 3:23:30 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: The Great RJ

Technically, the United States itself is the President of the Security Council this month. As President of the United States and a superior officer of the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., he has the authority to represent the United States personally in that capacity. Al Gore was once President of the Security Council when he was Vice President of the United States.


32 posted on 09/08/2009 3:40:00 PM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: The Great RJ

I thought I read somewhere that none of the five permanent members can chair the Security Council.


33 posted on 09/08/2009 3:46:44 PM PDT by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson