Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Valley armed with B.E.A.R. vehicle(Ballistic Engineered Armored Response in South Texas)
The Monitor ^ | September 07, 2009 | Jared Taylor

Posted on 09/08/2009 11:50:20 AM PDT by SwinneySwitch

EDINBURG — As the old adage goes, it’s better to have a gun and not need it, than to need a gun and not have it.

With that in mind, say hello to the B.E.A.R. — the Rio Grande Valley’s newest tool to fight potentially violent standoffs and manhunts.

The armor-plated vehicle stands more than 12 feet tall and can carry at least three six-member SWAT teams inside — or rescue 35 schoolchildren.

A detachable battering ram at the front of the vehicle promises to smash through suspected drug cartel members’ reinforced lairs or other structures. Eight openings in the B.E.A.R.’s bulletproof walls and windows give law enforcement the ability to return fire.

The vehicle is designed to withstand armor-piercing rounds, grenades — even roadside bombs like those seen by troops fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

A turret that rises through the B.E.A.R.’s ceiling even allows officers to mount a machine gun, if needed. “It’s a real neat vehicle,” Hidalgo County Sheriff Lupe Treviño said.

Treviño introduced the vehicle last week. Purchased entirely with federal funds, the Lenco B.E.A.R. — Ballistic Engineered Armored Response vehicle — is the first of its kind for law enforcement agencies south of San Antonio.

The B.E.A.R. came with a $346,000 price tag — more than most homes in the Valley, let alone many RVs driven by Winter Texans.

Treviño defended the purchase, given that no local money was spent — the U.S. Department of Homeland Security gave the sheriff’s office a $1.6 million Operation Stonegarden grant to cover the cost last year. Stonegarden funds go to local law enforcement to fight border violence.

“The people of Hidalgo County did not have to lay down one cent for this,” Treviño said.

Most larger law enforcement agencies across the country have vehicles to quell standoffs, with the B.E.A.R. providing cover when they turn violent. Beyond protecting the cops, the vehicle can also be used to rescue hostages.

Pittsfield, Mass.-based Lenco Industries Inc. has sold about 500 of the B.E.A.R. vehicles and its smaller variant, the BearCat, since its inception in 1999, company president Len Light said.

Lenco’s customers initially came under criticism when the vehicles started rolling out because of their cost, Light said. But in the past decade, no firearm or explosive has breached the Lenco vehicles’ armor.

“These have been lifesavers,” he said.

Armed standoffs are not part of daily life in the Valley, but they have occurred, and with the B.E.A.R., “you know your men, your SWAT team and the public is going to be secure,” the sheriff said.

“Hopefully we’ll never have to run up against that,” Treviño said of armed standoffs. “But, you never know.”

The B.E.A.R. also comes equipped with an infrared camera that will allow SWAT teams to hunt down criminals who may be hiding out in rough terrain, even at night. State and federal helicopter units use the same technology during manhunts along the border.

Treviño said the B.E.A.R. will be available for any law enforcement agency in South Texas to use in hostile situations — should the need arise.

“We’ll even pay for the gas,” he said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: banglist; donutwatch; mexico; operationstonegarden; policestate; swat; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: Eaker

It’s hard to find good editors these days.


61 posted on 09/08/2009 4:37:22 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (Valle - beyond your expectations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

“It will likely not be used for border issues, but against American citizens.”

That is correct. If you don’t pay your property taxes they will use these armored vehicles against you.

http://www.swattrucks.com/info/LaCrosseTribune.pdf


62 posted on 09/08/2009 5:05:12 PM PDT by ThE_RiPpEr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ThE_RiPpEr.

“That is correct. If you don’t pay your property taxes they will use these armored vehicles against you.”

All our property really belongs to the State. If you don’t pay your rent to the State for the property they allow you to “own”, they will come for you.

Gotta love the “Land of the Free!”


63 posted on 09/08/2009 5:14:24 PM PDT by Favor Center (Targets up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“You have no idea what it will be used for, I wonder if you are even very familiar with that part of Texas.”

I half grew-up in Harlingen, so wonder all you want.


64 posted on 09/08/2009 5:15:30 PM PDT by Favor Center (Targets up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

All our property really belongs to the State. If you don’t pay your rent to the State for the property they allow you to “own”, they will come for you.

Gotta love the “Land of the Free!”
____________

The last remaining Native Americans could not agree with you more.


65 posted on 09/08/2009 5:18:12 PM PDT by awake-n-angry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

Then you should be able to imagine that the region may have a use for a bullet resistant transport/rescue vehicle besides using it to oppress law abiding Texans.


66 posted on 09/08/2009 5:32:24 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“Then you should be able to imagine that the region may have a use for a bullet resistant transport/rescue vehicle besides using it to oppress law abiding Texans.”

I’m confident I have a pretty good handle on what SWAT is often used against.


67 posted on 09/08/2009 5:34:13 PM PDT by Favor Center (Targets up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

Well I tried, you are just too buggy for me, you seem to have something on your mind but you aren’t very coherent in getting it out.


68 posted on 09/08/2009 5:38:19 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“Well I tried, you are just too buggy for me, you seem to have something on your mind but you aren’t very coherent in getting it out.”

What is so “buggy” about an aversion to increasing the power of the state? Others in this thread seem to understand me.


69 posted on 09/08/2009 5:42:35 PM PDT by Favor Center (Targets up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center
What is so “buggy” about an aversion to increasing the power of the state?

That is a good example of being buggy right there, you don't really think that is what I meant when I said that you are too buggy and incoherent for me, but you pretend to because it is easier for you to write both sides of the conversation.

70 posted on 09/08/2009 6:00:22 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

71 posted on 09/08/2009 6:02:29 PM PDT by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Nice.


72 posted on 09/08/2009 6:03:26 PM PDT by fanfan (Why did they bury Barry's past?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“That is a good example of being buggy right there, you don’t really think that is what I meant when I said that you are too buggy and incoherent for me, but you pretend to because it is easier for you to write both sides of the conversation.”

Perhaps you have not been following the thread and the tenor of your own posts?


73 posted on 09/08/2009 6:17:47 PM PDT by Favor Center (Targets up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

I am aware of my posts and how buggy your posts have been that you post to me, your very first post to me was typical of what I called buggy, and they haven’t improved since.


74 posted on 09/08/2009 6:24:20 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“I am aware of my posts and how buggy your posts have been that you post to me, your very first post to me was typical of what I called buggy, and they haven’t improved since.”

Then our communication problem is unsolvable. Good evening.


75 posted on 09/08/2009 6:25:54 PM PDT by Favor Center (Targets up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

Thank you.


76 posted on 09/08/2009 6:29:48 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson