Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How effective is CBP in keeping U.S. borders safe?
Homeland Security Newswire ^ | Sept. 2, 2009 | HSN

Posted on 09/07/2009 1:21:04 PM PDT by AuntB

According to DHS, the vast majority -- more than 70 percent -- of illegal aliens and contraband attempting to move across our border through official ports of entry will succeed

In fiscal 2008 U.S. Border Patrol officers working at checkpoints that are typically set up along roads and highways 25 to 100 miles north of the U.S.-Mexico border stopped three people "who were identified as persons linked to terrorism," according to information provided by the Border Patrol to the Government Accountability Office. "In addition," says a GAO report released Monday, "the Border Patrol reported that in fiscal year 2008 checkpoints encountered 530 aliens from special interest countries, which are countries the Department of State has determined to represent a potential terrorist threat to the United States."

According to DHS, which oversees the Border Patrol, the vast majority of illegal aliens and contraband attempting to move across our border through official ports of entry will succeed. In other words, Terry Jeffrey writes in Townhall.com, U.S. border security fails most of the time -- not out in remote desert areas, but at official ports of entry where people and vehicles can be stopped and screened.

"At the ports of entry," reports GAO, "CBP (Customs and Border Patrol) has both increased training for agents and enhanced technology. However, the DHS Annual Performance Report for fiscal years 2008-2010 sets a goal for detecting and apprehending about 30 percent of major illegal activity at ports of entry in 2009, indicating that 70 percent of criminals and contraband may pass through the ports and continue on interstates and major roads to the interior of the United States."

DHS's in-house performance review "paints a disturbing picture of an agency failing in carrying out a vital national security function of the federal government," Jeffrey writes.

On 15 January, the outgoing Bush administration published the "Department of Homeland Security Annual Performance Report: Fiscal Years 2008-2010." The report, which quantifies the department's recent past performance and sets future goals, was updated by the Obama administration on 7 May.

The report says DHS's No. 1 goal is: "Protect our nation from dangerous people." One objective for achieving this goal is: "Strengthen screening of travelers and workers." It defines this as "(r)educing the risk that potential terrorists or others who pose a threat will exploit travel and employment opportunities to harm our Nation."

On page 36, the report lists inspections at ports of entry as one of the programs designed to achieve this objective and says DHS's goal for this program is improve "the targeting, screening, and apprehension of high-risk international cargo and travelers to prevent terrorist attacks, while providing processes to facilitate the flow of safe and legitimate trade and travel."

One "measure" of whether DHS is achieving this goal, the DHS report says, is "land border apprehension rates for major violations."

In fiscal year 2008, says the DHS report, the department set a goal of apprehending 35 percent of the major violations at border ports of entry. The report estimates that DHS actually apprehended only 28.9 percent. Approximately 71.1 percent of "major violations" got through.

Jeffrey notes that had DHS met its goal, 65 percent of major violations would have gotten through.

In fiscal 2009 DHS's goal is to apprehend only 28 percent of the major violations at border ports entry. For fiscal 2010, which begins next month, DHS has set a goal of apprehending 29 percent of the major violations.

"That means," Jeffrey writes, "that next year -- if DHS actually achieves its goal -- 71 percent of major violators presenting themselves at U.S. border ports will be allowed to enter the United States undetected."

Jeffrey concludes: 'Before President Obama closes the Guantanamo Bay prison where we keep the terrorists we do capture, perhaps he should secure the ports of entry at our border where a terrorist has about a 70 percent chance of escaping capture."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; borderpatrol; cpb; dhs; homelandsecurity; immigration; mexico; terrorism; wot
Article forwarded by NAFBPO.
1 posted on 09/07/2009 1:21:04 PM PDT by AuntB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Disgraceful. Plus, checking people for weapons as they leave the U.S. for Mexico takes manpower that could be put to better use stopping bad guys and the bad stuff from entering.


2 posted on 09/07/2009 1:25:18 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

“Disgraceful. Plus, checking people for weapons as they leave the U.S. for Mexico takes manpower that could be put to better use stopping bad guys and the bad stuff from entering.”

There ya go..making sense again!


3 posted on 09/07/2009 1:26:43 PM PDT by AuntB (If the TALIBAN grew drugs & burned our land instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
The only thing worth looking for on outbounds to Mexico is money. Everything else is a needle in a haystack search to support a political narrative.
4 posted on 09/07/2009 1:40:27 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Too bad we don’t have dogs or machines that can smell money.


5 posted on 09/07/2009 1:41:44 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
But, but, but, you said the problem could be solved by enforcement only.

How many BP agents will it take?

6 posted on 09/07/2009 1:50:18 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Come on, Obama’s happy. His pals are happy. That’s all that counts.


7 posted on 09/07/2009 1:51:00 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia; SwinneySwitch; All

More BAD news...rumor from Mexico news is that these are US military from Fort Bliss. Swinney, have you heard anything?

http://www.elpasotimes.com/newupdated/ci_13286555

Update: One of four men (Americans) shot to death outside Juárez motel was former Bliss solider


8 posted on 09/07/2009 1:51:24 PM PDT by AuntB (If the TALIBAN grew drugs & burned our land instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

You call this ‘enforcement’? Well, of course YOU do!

Bye!


9 posted on 09/07/2009 1:52:48 PM PDT by AuntB (If the TALIBAN grew drugs & burned our land instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Currency dogs are available, but not widely. A lot of times there is enough drug residue on cash that drug dogs can pick it up.


10 posted on 09/07/2009 1:58:29 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

El Diario de Juarez reports this, among other shootings, but doesn’t say anything about the victims except that 70 shots were fired at them.


11 posted on 09/07/2009 1:58:52 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Dadgummit, are we ever going to get a POTUS that cares enough about the safety of this country and it’s people to protect it and us?


12 posted on 09/07/2009 1:59:21 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

“Dadgummit, are we ever going to get a POTUS that cares enough about the safety of this country and it’s people to protect it and us?”

From the list of the GOP ‘favorites’...NO.


13 posted on 09/07/2009 2:09:33 PM PDT by AuntB (If the TALIBAN grew drugs & burned our land instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

BP Agents are doing just fine, as they work the areas between the POEs. It is the ICE Agents that work the POES and that’s where the major problem is located.


14 posted on 09/07/2009 2:55:07 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AuntB; All

Former Fort Bliss employee shot and killed outside Juarez hotel

http://www.kvia.com/global/story.asp?s=11086977

Updated: Sep 7, 2009 06:31 PM CDT

By News/Web Producer Joe Villasana

JUAREZ — Armed gunmen arrived at the Campo Real Hotel in Waterfill and killed four people, including a former Fort Bliss employee, according to Chihuahua State Police.

Eduardo Guillen, 33, retired from the post six years ago, officials said. Monday, his family identified the body. Guillen was currently an employee with the U.S. postal service, according to XHIJ Channel 44 in Juarez.

Also found dead at the scene of the crime were Jesus Martinez and Luis Gutierrez, both Mexican citizens. According to XHIJ, both men operated a used car lot in Waterfill.

A fourth victim has not been identified, officials said.


15 posted on 09/08/2009 11:12:46 AM PDT by SwinneySwitch (ObommaNation - beyond your expectations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson