Respectfully, where do YOU suggest we begin? I see this as a foot in the door where we expose all the commies in power.
I have dealt with these types. Who just complain. p*ss on campfires, but then dont offer any alternative, constructive ideas. Forget ‘em.
In my humble opinion, if I had any say, I'd push the Valerie Jarret comment about recruiting Jones since Oakland (2001) at the height of his anti-US activities.
“I see this as a foot in the door where we expose all the commies in power.”
It’s not a foot in the door. It could be, I suppose, if he is intimately tied to 0bama.
The work has just begun is my point.
As well, this ‘resignation’ has just inflamed the left—that’s all I’m going to say about that at a public forum.
I would have kept Van Jones where he was, for the time being.
This guy means basically nothing. He was a tool that we no longer have to highlight who the current POTUS is.
If I were 0bama, I would have played it just like this. I knew it was coming when he remained so quiet about Jones.
A pawn has been sacrificed for greater gain.
This is my guess. We’ll see how it is played out over the next week.
I say it will hurt the right, ultimately.
Van Jones should have been used to highlight who 0bama was. Beck went after Jones, not 0bama.
We need to do research on the rest of the czars before they bury their stuff. One czar at a time and keep going until we get to the center......the bilderbergs or whoever....
Agree.