The senior crowd went for 0’b, they lionized him, then all the RATS talk about is ‘’offing’’ people,,,,,,,,go figure.
Brooks, Frum, Parker..all these and many others pose as “Conservative Columnists” when in reality their just plain Liberals. They gained their status as a guise and it’s classic propaganda straight out of the Communist Playbook. They know they have to influence through the media to hypnotize the masses, and a Liberal posing as Conservative Columnist is a perfect example of it. Brooks, Frum, Parker et.al are in their positions so they can attempt to “deconstruct” conservatism: divide and conquer by weakening or watering down the ideology. They’re all card carrying liberals in sheep’s clothing.
Through the elderlys growing up period, how much money did they pay out for insurance that they never used? That money was used to help others. These people wanting to take away the golden years are animals.
So Brooks is pro-death when it comes to people he deems useless and worthless. Tell me again why these people get so upset when they are compared to Nazis? If the jackboot fits, wear it, David Brooks.
Remember when the RATS used to accuse republicans of wanting to kill old people?
Accuse others of what you do.
Modus Operandi of the communist party of the USA.
This is why so many doofus talking-heads (and even a few folks here) are trying to claim the euphemism Death Panels is, to put it as Scarborough did, "... a bald-faced lie." No, it isn't -- a group of appointed persons (panel) will determine who shall receive treatment, medicine, procedure and who shall not, those who are denied die where they may well have survived had they received the care (death).
It isn't about "pulling the plug on grandma" -- it is more akin to not putting in the plug in the first place.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203863204574348222870510340.html
After discussing the situation of his grandmother and the costs associated with her final treatment, Obama said the following in discussing how to deal with "the chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives":
Well, I think that there is going to have to be a conversation that is guided by doctors, scientists, ethicists. And then there is going to have to be a very difficult democratic conversation that takes place. It is very difficult to imagine the country making those decisions just through the normal political channels. And that's part of why you have to have some independent group that can give you guidance. It's not determinative, but I think has to be able to give you some guidance. And that's part of what I suspect you'll see emerging out of the various health care conversations that are taking place on the Hill right now.
It's impossible to find a clearer prescription for the Death Panels that will be in any Obamacare law, no matter how they are configured. Please pass the linked article on to everyone you know. Obama is the Chief Ghoul.
Can you imagine what will ensue when the first breakdown “studies” come out, giving the numbers for the different “end-of-life alternatives” as they are applied by race? Oh, what fun.