Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US airstrike incinerates scores of civilians [Obama lied! People died!]
World Socialist Web Site ^ | September 5, 2009 | Patrick Martin

Posted on 09/05/2009 5:52:58 AM PDT by grundle

An airstrike by US warplanes operating as part of the NATO occupation in northern Afghanistan killed more than 100 people early Friday morning, most of them civilians who were incinerated when two gasoline tankers, hit by bombs, exploded in flames.

Large numbers of severely wounded have been taken to the local hospital in trucks and carts.

The two tankers, hijacked by Taliban guerrillas, became stuck in the mud trying to cross the Kunduz River. The insurgents abandoned the tankers after opening the valves, and the local population of the village of Omar Kheil rushed from their homes to pour off gasoline into any containers they could find.

The British Guardian quoted Moeen Marastial, a member of parliament from Kunduz, as saying: “Local people are telling me 130 people have been killed despite all the promises of Nato to do fewer bombardments and reduce civilian casualties. There will be a reaction to this. It is a very bad day for international forces in Afghanistan.”

Another local MP, Mohammed Amin Qaneh, said: “We are very upset; a lot of ordinary people have been killed. Why did they have to bomb the tankers? Does Nato put the price of oil higher than the price of blood? We want justice; we want those responsible punished.”

Abdul Moman Omar Kheil, member of the Kunduz provincial council and a native of the village where the airstrike happened, explained the circumstances of the mass killing, telling the press that many local residents were awake at the time because of a late-night wedding party and celebrations marking Ramadan, the month-long period when practicing Muslims only eat and drink at night.

This account was confirmed by a Taliban spokesman who gave a statement to the Associated Press saying that guerrillas had captured the two tankers as they were being driven along a supply line from Tajikistan to the Afghan capital, Kabul.

While this scramble for precious fuel was underway, at about 2:30 a.m. local time, German military forces who patrol in Kunduz province as part of the NATO occupation called in an air attack, which was carried out by two US F-15 fighter-bombers. Each jet hit the tankers with a 500-pound bomb.

There were hellish scenes at the hospital in Kunduz, the provincial capital, about 15 miles north of the village. “Wounded people with extensive burns crowded a hospital in Kunduz,” the French news agency AFP reported. “An AFP reporter said around eight were in terrible condition— the skin burnt black and peeling off to expose raw red muscle. Others were silent in agony with incinerated clothes stuck to their flesh.”

An eyewitness, Mohammad Daud, 32, told AFP villagers rushed to one of the trucks when it got stuck in the river to take free fuel at the Taliban’s invitation. “Everyone around the fuel tanker died,” he said. “Nobody was in one piece. Hands, legs and body parts were scattered everywhere. Those who were away from the fuel tanker were badly burnt.”

Reuters reported: “The desperately poor Afghan villagers heard that the Taliban had abandoned loaded fuel tankers by the river and thought it was their lucky day. Hundreds ran to fill jugs of the valuable stuff. Suddenly, a U.S. F-15 fighter jet roared over and opened fire. Mohammad Deen heard the explosion. When the flames died away by Friday morning, charred corpses were still strewn on the riverbank.

“Villagers could scarcely conceal their rage. ‘It’s a tragedy, and people are angry, very angry. The international community came here to help, but they are not helping anymore, they are only dropping bombs on us,’ said Deen. Video footage filmed by Afghans at the scene the next morning showed piles of charred bodies lying by the river, beside chunks of twisted metal. The frame of one of the tanker trucks still smoldered.”

NATO officials initially claimed all those killed were Taliban fighters. A German army spokeswoman told the media, “We are fairly certain that they were all insurgents, but we are not 100 percent sure.” She added, “After assessing that only insurgents were in the area, the local ISAF commander ordered an airstrike which destroyed the fuel trucks and a large number of insurgents were killed and injured.”

The puppet Afghan government of President Hamid Karzai echoed these claims, but the story subsequently underwent repeated adjustment as victims flooded the hospital in Kunduz and the scale of the catastrophe for the civilian population became undeniable.

The latest US-NATO atrocity gives the lie to the claims by the Obama administration and the Pentagon that the escalation of American military intervention in Afghanistan is aimed at defending the population from the resurgence of the Taliban, whose regime the Bush administration overthrew in 2001.

The day before the airstrike near Kunduz, Admiral Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told a Pentagon press conference that he had forwarded to President Obama a review of conditions in Afghanistan by the theater commander, General Stanley McChrystal.

Refusing to answer questions about how many additional troops McChrystal would seek, Mullen said, “What’s more important than the number of troops he may or may not ask for is how he intends to use them. It should come as no surprise to anyone that he intends to use those forces under his command to protect the Afghan people.”

After the atrocity at Omar Kheil, one could justly conclude that no worse fate can befall a people than to be singled out for such “protection” by American imperialism.

The location of the mass killing has military as well as political significance. Kunduz province is in the northern tier of Afghanistan, the region largely populated by minority Tajiks and Uzbeks, and long considered stable, at least by comparison with the Pashtun-populated regions of the south and east.

There have been a series of violent incidents in Kunduz, suggesting a growing ability by the Taliban or other anti-occupation forces to strike throughout the country. Former Afghan president Burhanuddin Rabbani, leader of the Jamiat-i-Islami Afghanistan party, narrowly escaped assassination August 13, when his convoy was ambushed on the Kabul-Kunduz highway in Aliabad district. Rabbani was campaigning for the election of Karzai’s strongest opponent in the August 20 presidential election, former foreign minister Abdullah Abdullah. Three weeks earlier, Karzai’s running-mate, Mohammad Qasim Fahim, escaped a similar attack in the Khanabad district of Kunduz.

According to an August 31report by McClatchy newspapers, the Taliban resurgence has become a strategic threat to the US-NATO occupation. McClatchy reported:

“Taliban insurgents have taken over parts of two northern provinces from which they were driven in 2001, threatening to disrupt NATO’s new supply route from Central Asia and expand a war that has largely been confined to Afghanistan’s southern half, US and Afghan officials said. Insurgents operating out of Baghlan district along the highway from Tajikistan launched coordinated attacks during the Aug. 20 presidential elections, killing the district police chief and a civilian, while losing a dozen of their own men, local officials said. It was the worst bloodshed reported in the country that day.

“Violence has been on the rise in recent months, however, as the Taliban and al-Qaida-linked foreign fighters have staged hit-and-run attacks, bombings and rocket strikes on German, Belgian and Hungarian forces in Baghlan and neighboring Kunduz provinces. The insurgents now control three Pashtun-dominated districts in Kunduz and Baghlan-i-Jadid, a foothold in a region that was long considered safe.”

McClatchy quoted an unnamed “senior U.S. intelligence official” pointing out that the insurgents were targeting a recently developed logistics route that supplements the main route from the Pakistani port of Karachi and up through the Khyber Pass, which has been under increasing Taliban attack on both sides of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.

The new route consists of roads from Uzbekistan and Tajikistan which merge and run south through the Hindu Kush mountains to Kabul and the main US airbase and supply center at Bagram. “The concern is if we don’t stunt the (Taliban) growth, it could cause problems with our northern distribution network,” the intelligence official told the news service.

The British newspaper Guardian, in its report on the Omar Kheil massacre, noted, “Today’s reports talk about the Taliban, but Uzbek jihadists with close links to al-Qaida are said to be spreading into the area. Whoever they are, it is one more indicator that security is crumbling across Afghanistan.”

This latest atrocity marks the worst massacre of Afghan civilians by US-led NATO forces since May, when airstrikes by US warplanes against villages in western Farah province claimed the lives of 140 people, according to an investigation by the Afghan government.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 09/05/2009 5:52:58 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

“World Socialist Web Site”

-You have to be kidding.-


2 posted on 09/05/2009 5:57:03 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas has yet to learn submission to any oppression, come from what source it may. -Sam Houston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
when it got stuck in the river to take free fuel at the Taliban’s invitation.

The villagers seem to overlooking this to blame the US.

3 posted on 09/05/2009 6:00:39 AM PDT by Vor Lady ("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Was Pelosi there?

D*mn, missed again.


4 posted on 09/05/2009 6:01:02 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Ditto


5 posted on 09/05/2009 6:01:14 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

“World Socialist Web Site” this morning...

MSM tonight.


6 posted on 09/05/2009 6:05:51 AM PDT by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

MSN tonight.

Unfortunately that is closer to the truth than it should be.


7 posted on 09/05/2009 6:07:20 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas has yet to learn submission to any oppression, come from what source it may. -Sam Houston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Taliban is in the redistributive branch of the oil biz now, eh? Doing the Robin Hood thing, that’s really swell of them. Wretched Americans! to take their noble gesture and twist it into something ugly!
I bet this will just encourage them to keep doing it.


8 posted on 09/05/2009 6:08:20 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Rebellion is not brewing. Frog is brewing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Funny how so many “civilians” just happened to be hanging around with terrorists at 2:30am. Just a coincidence...
9 posted on 09/05/2009 6:09:34 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
The two tankers, hijacked by Taliban guerrillas, became stuck in the mud trying to cross the Kunduz River. The insurgents abandoned the tankers after opening the valves

Deliberately spilling oil into a river? Where is the outrage from the environmentalists? Imagine if U.S. troops had done this.

10 posted on 09/05/2009 6:12:13 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
We are very upset; a lot of ordinary people have been killed.

I felt the same way since 9/11/2001

11 posted on 09/05/2009 6:14:29 AM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil
The World Socialist writer stepped on his own crank when he added ".....at the Taliban’s invitation" to the tale.
12 posted on 09/05/2009 6:16:59 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

“a late-night wedding party “

Riiiiiiiiight!


13 posted on 09/05/2009 6:19:02 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
Just a coincidence...

These people were criminals. At the very least, they were "receiving stolen goods." When one participates in a crime, there is a risk...

If someone owns something, it is within their rights to destroy it. If you are illegally trying to take it when they make and execute this decision and suffer as a result, it is your fault, not the owners'.
14 posted on 09/05/2009 6:22:04 AM PDT by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
Just a coincidence...

These people were criminals. At the very least, they were "receiving stolen goods." When one participates in a crime, there is a risk...

If someone owns something, it is within their rights to destroy it. If you are illegally trying to take it when they make and execute this decision and suffer as a result, it is your fault, not the owners'.
15 posted on 09/05/2009 6:22:54 AM PDT by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Dang it, we only killed a bunch of civilians again. You would think they would start getting smarter and targeting only the dang terrorists, but they always seem to get away and only leave the civilian bodies. I guess it’s kind of hard to tell one from the other, since the terrorists don’t want to wear any insignia or forms of identification.

Kinda’ like the Right-Wing domestic terrorists that have infiltrated the U.S.A. Maybe we should start wearing some kind of identification so Nancy Pelosi can recongnize us.


16 posted on 09/05/2009 6:37:33 AM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BallyBill

We need to kick their asses quick and get this over with! And converting to true christianity will be a big help to because that muslim religion really sucks and makes those folks fodder for the taliban.


17 posted on 09/05/2009 6:41:29 AM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: grundle

1, it was reported 90 people.
2. half were the terrorists trying to save the fuel trucks.
3. it was DIESEL FUEL, not gasoline.
4. why are civilians consorting with terrorists???


18 posted on 09/05/2009 6:43:16 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

German military forces who patrol in Kunduz province as part of the NATO occupation called in an air attack, which was carried out by two US F-15 fighter-bombers. Each jet hit the tankers with a 500-pound bomb.


sorry but this is not the fault of the US this time.
If this has been a failure (because who really knows how many of this killed “civillians” have been Taliban) then
the guilt would be for the german troops who called this airstrike. the Pilot hit exactly the target he should hit.
so he is not rensponsible for the killed civilians.


19 posted on 09/05/2009 7:00:05 AM PDT by Jonny foreigner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
There's no such thing as free lunch diesel.
20 posted on 09/05/2009 7:04:04 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson