Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ashcroft may be sued in 9/11 case, court rules
AP ^

Posted on 09/04/2009 4:55:54 PM PDT by blueyon

BOISE, Idaho - A federal appeals court delivered a stinging rebuke Friday to the Bush administration’s post-Sept. 11 detention policies, ruling that former Attorney General John Ashcroft can be held liable for people who were wrongfully detained as material witnesses after 9/11.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the government’s improper use of material witnesses after Sept. 11 was “repugnant to the Constitution and a painful reminder of some of the most ignominious chapters of our national history.”

The court found that a man who was detained as a witness in a federal terrorism case can sue Ashcroft for allegedly violating his constitutional rights. Abdullah al-Kidd, a U.S. citizen and former University of Idaho student, filed the lawsuit against Ashcroft and other officials in 2005, claiming his civil rights were violated when he was detained as a material witness for two weeks in 2003.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; 9thcircuit; agenda; ashcroft; lawsuit; obama; ruling; september12era; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Unreal!
1 posted on 09/04/2009 4:55:54 PM PDT by blueyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueyon
9th circuit = overturn.


AMERICA AT THE CROSSROADS OF HISTORY

2 posted on 09/04/2009 4:57:00 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

9th Circus strikes again...


3 posted on 09/04/2009 4:57:47 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour
You beat me to it, FRiend!

Lamh Foistenach Abu!
4 posted on 09/04/2009 4:59:28 PM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN 1969. St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Background link with additional info here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2332440/posts


5 posted on 09/04/2009 4:59:30 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

That 3-judge panel sounds hysterical, although I don’t know for a fact that they are female.


6 posted on 09/04/2009 4:59:50 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Health Care Reform has met the DEATH Panel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
A federal appeals court delivered a stinging rebuke Friday to the Bush administration’s post-Sept. 11 detention policies, ruling that former Attorney General John Ashcroft can be held liable for people who were wrongfully detained as material witnesses after 9/11.

That will teach the Bush administration to do the right thing and protect the sovereignty of our country.

To the leftists THAT in itself a a prosecutable offense!

7 posted on 09/04/2009 5:02:36 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Why am I thinking that President Bush really isn’t feeling stung...

Unless he landed on a bee while falling down laughing...


8 posted on 09/04/2009 5:05:44 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (There's something socialist in the neighborhood, who ya gonna call? MITTBUSTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

SCOTUS has already set precedent here meaning once again the Ninth Circuit stepped on their johnson and they will be overturned.


9 posted on 09/04/2009 5:08:13 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (CommieCare: Need a Stent, Take a Red Pill. Next!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Words fail.

Actually, that’s what I always say, when I know that if I said what was on my mind........ I would likely go to jail.


10 posted on 09/04/2009 5:09:51 PM PDT by Gator113 (YES WE CAN.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cMxJBenigY&feature=related)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

I guess anybody can sue for anything if he finds a lawyer who is unscrupulous enough, not a stretch by any means. But if somene like Ashcroft can be hanged for doing his duty, then it will indicate that we lost both WWII and the Cold War after all— and another round is needed to get it right. ‘Twill be time to get the musket down from over the mantlepiece.


11 posted on 09/04/2009 5:11:09 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

I was “Uh-oh” when I read the headline, and then I read that it’s by the 9th Court...


12 posted on 09/04/2009 5:11:42 PM PDT by paudio (Road to hell is paved by unintended consequences of good intentions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
Well BOO, HOO, HOO! Get a CLUE!

Is this the 9th. CIRCUS again? Hopefully, the Supremes will overturn another of their ridiculous rulings!

13 posted on 09/04/2009 5:20:46 PM PDT by boatbums (A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

I’m guessing that the removal of executive branch sovereignty will last right up until the moment the Democrats are out of office.


14 posted on 09/04/2009 5:21:06 PM PDT by denydenydeny ("I'm sure this goes against everything you've been taught, but right and wrong do exist"-Dr House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

In an MSNBC report it used a quote by Judge Milan A. Smith and then claimed that he was speaking “for the majority.” One is left to assume that the three judge panel was split 2-1. However, given the usual clarity of MSNBC reporting, who knows?


15 posted on 09/04/2009 5:27:08 PM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Melchior

This is not only hypocrisy but it is pathetic.


16 posted on 09/04/2009 5:28:07 PM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Part of Obama’s plan to ‘fundamentally change’ America....


17 posted on 09/04/2009 5:34:39 PM PDT by Freddd (Government run health care=paying more and being denied what we already have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Aww poor thing he was ‘detained’ for 2 weeks!


18 posted on 09/04/2009 5:36:15 PM PDT by Freddd (Government run health care=paying more and being denied what we already have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Oh, it’s the 9th Circus. Nothing to see here. Moving on.


19 posted on 09/04/2009 5:40:27 PM PDT by Beloved Levinite (I have a new name for the occupier of The Oval Office: KING FRAUD! (pronounced King "Faa-raud"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Cant have that, Gator. So shut yer mouth!! ;)


20 posted on 09/04/2009 5:43:07 PM PDT by Beloved Levinite (I have a new name for the occupier of The Oval Office: KING FRAUD! (pronounced King "Faa-raud"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson