Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HighWheeler

I would be willing to believe the school system has a no pictures policy on school property. Don’ty be too quick to fault the officer for enforcing it.


22 posted on 09/03/2009 8:34:56 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

So their text books don’t have pictures? So they don’t take school photos? So they don’t paint pictures in art class? So they don’t have the picture of the President in the main hallway?

I would love to see the policy code that can partition one image from another, into two categories, such as between acceptable photos of school officials, students, the President, etc. and having “objectionable” images.
That would be a fun lawsuit.


25 posted on 09/03/2009 8:42:00 PM PDT by HighWheeler (The higher the concentration of libs, the bigger the tragedy that follows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN

It’s already established that other people had posters with signs. Cheeks acknowledged that he was singling out Parks because he (Cheeks) didn’t like the picture.

If there were, in fact, a “no pictures policy” on school grounds—which is ridiculous on its face—the Fairfax School System would have said that it its response. It didn’t.


39 posted on 09/04/2009 2:55:39 AM PDT by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson