and the RATS, take another one in the..............................HA ha!!!
Could?
His PAST??? A LOT of this stuff is from the VERY recent past.
All his Gestapo Czars are going to cause issues for the Liberal God and the US Congress.
What liability? He fits right in with the rest of the Obamaloons.
The traitor-in-chief is not exactly being subtle about his status as a communist traitor mole.
Obama? Van Jones? What is the difference? Same POS. they mirror each other, only difference is that O has a bunch of Chitown whiteys in charge of him.
Without those Chitown whiteys, O would still be a freakin’ communist..er community organizer.
it’s only gonna cause trouble if the Republicans cause a stink, which they should....
Evidence of his lame excuse of an apology (for getting caught) means they’ve recognized there’s a growing backlash to him and those like him who are defiling our National treasures, National security secrets and our White House. Daylight is the best disinfectant.
Throw him under the Bus, Throw him under the Bus! The new chant for the Bozo crowd.
Yeah, can't have people who aren't afraid to call themselves commies, they have to be sneaked in under cover.
Which gets us to the BO White House vetting process. Either they knew about the huge, looming skeletons in his closet, and didn't care, or they didn't have a clue prior to is appointment. Either way, they look bad, that is, either arrogant or dangerously amateur.
Question: must these “czars” pass a security check? What kind of vetting are they subject to?
Suppose they go through the standard FBI background check, what then? Does the report just go to the powers-that-be in the White House? At what point, with what evidence, would they be disqualified?
In other words, suppose the FBI turned up all the dirt we’re not seeing on Van Jones, reported it to Obama’s people, and they just said OK and hired him anyway.
Is this plausible? Is there any automatic disqualification for high government jobs?
Bush nominees face invasive vetting process
Snippet: Previous cabinet members and other government appointees who endured the rigorous screening were hesitant to discuss their vetting, but in years past it has been described as invasive, humiliating and unpleasant. But it’s all worth it, they say, for a chance at one of the 6,000 highly coveted positions appointed by the president at the beginning of a new administration.
After candidates fill out a barrage of forms, revealing intimate details of their personal and financial lives, FBI and IRS agents investigate and reinvestigate to verify the information.
Agents talk with former employers, high school classmates, neighbors and ex-spouses, asking when the candidate came to work each day, whether he or she used drugs or alcohol or ever paid an employee under the table.
Some pundits are sure he’ll be fired any minute now — but he’ll still be *there* inside Obama!
Was something discovered in the wood pile?