Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan to Spend $21 Billion on a Power Plant in Space
Gizmodo ^ | September 1, 2009 | Adam Frucci

Posted on 09/02/2009 1:15:14 AM PDT by Talisker

Japan is getting prepped to drop $21 billion on a solar power station in space. The whole deal is being put together by Mitsubishi Electric Corp. and industrial design company IGI Corp. The plan involves a gigantic solar panel floating around in space, soaking up a gigawatt of energy and beaming it to Earth without the use of cables. And they hope to have it ready to rock within four years.


(Excerpt) Read more at gizmodo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: borg; deathray; deathstar; energy; solar; thatsnomoon

1 posted on 09/02/2009 1:15:15 AM PDT by Talisker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Talisker

more space junk


2 posted on 09/02/2009 1:21:20 AM PDT by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
"...And they hope to have it ready to rock within four years. "

Fours Years!!!

...Yikes...In this country it would take a year to get the committee formed, another 1.5 years for public discussion, debate, compromise,
one year for the budget to be submitted, analyzed, reviewed, added/deleted/modified,approved,...
year for the prototype, production model plans drawn up,
one year for the incremental funding to work its way through the process,...
then program cancelled for lack of viability.

3 posted on 09/02/2009 1:24:16 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
"...And they hope to have it ready to rock within four years. "

Fours Years!!!

...Yikes...In this country it would take a year to get the committee formed,
two years for the necessary environmental impact studies concluded,
another 1.5 years for public discussion, debate, compromise,
one year for the budget to be submitted, analyzed, reviewed, added/deleted/modified,approved,...
year for the prototype, production model plans drawn up,
one year for the incremental funding to work its way through the process,...
then program cancelled for lack of viability.

4 posted on 09/02/2009 1:25:19 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen

The environmental impact study alone would take four years.


5 posted on 09/02/2009 1:27:27 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("I'm sure this goes against everything you've been taught, but right and wrong do exist"-Dr House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Deathstar keyword. :)
6 posted on 09/02/2009 1:30:47 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

haha...yeah, that does sound a bit hairy.


7 posted on 09/02/2009 1:36:27 AM PDT by Rick_Michael (Have no fear "President Government" is here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmost
Deathstar keyword

Keyword?, THIS is a keyword

allyourbasearebelongtous

8 posted on 09/02/2009 1:40:25 AM PDT by This_far
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
At least I'll have something to toast 2 pieces of bread if this thing ever gets knocked out of alignment.
9 posted on 09/02/2009 1:46:07 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: This_far
No clicky yet:) I guess the pwners are keeping it close to the vest.
10 posted on 09/02/2009 1:48:57 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
This sounds like a step to what Gerard K O'Neill had proposed back in 1970http://spacestudiesinstitute.wordpress.com/the-life-of-gerard-k-oneill/
11 posted on 09/02/2009 1:57:47 AM PDT by jmcenanly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmost
I guess the pwners are keeping it close to the vest

I've given up on having a flying car, but maybe a submarine in space is still possible?

12 posted on 09/02/2009 2:02:52 AM PDT by This_far
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

The “Greens” will kill this idea stone dead. You know...it’s going to kill little birds.


13 posted on 09/02/2009 2:04:39 AM PDT by CanaGuy (Go Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: This_far

14 posted on 09/02/2009 2:14:59 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

bookmark


15 posted on 09/02/2009 2:34:13 AM PDT by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Didn't SPECTRE already build one of these things?


16 posted on 09/02/2009 3:44:40 AM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly
Obama, of course, might give his Green Jobs Czar $42 Billion so that he can hire Mitsubishi as a contractor, and specify that the project be manned by illegal aliens. This project has the added advantage to Obama and Van Jones that it will deliver very little useful energy, fully in keeping with science advisor Holdren’s philosophy of reducing our productivity and cutting the energy we use by an order of magnitude.

Think about what is being proposed (the death of most serious solar projects). Capturing 1 gigawatt requires converting that to something useful. Since the proposal suggests “solar panels”, lets assume 1 kw/meter squared for the solar flux density. This will then require a million square meter solar array, a panel field on the order of 1.5 km on each side in geosynchronous orbit. Let's be generous about the conversion efficiency of solar cells - 20%. We start with 200 Megawatts at the output of the array - probably quite a bit less after conduction losses. Then, how do we get the electrical energy to earth? Convert low voltage from the array to higher voltages for powering a microwave transmitter? What is the conversion efficiency of the transmitter? Let's be unrealistic - 50%.
Now we have 100 Megawatts. How efficiently can we transmit microwaves through the earths atmosphere? Unless we transmit at one of the unique spectral windows, and the ones I know of are at the long end of the optical spectrum, we may couple 5% of the energy to a microwave receiver - and that is a pie-in-the-sky estimate. Who except for Obama would spend 21 billion dollars for a 5 megawatt power plant, which could be quite dangerous to animals of all sorts, when for the same money you could have between 4 and 8 gigawatts of nuclear-powered electric energy, depending upon the cut for the Natural Resources Defense Council - pay-to-play for not bringing monthly civil suits?

I have a more fitting idea. For $21 billion we could quadruple the staff of Acorn who could save us all that energy by manning tent camps which won't consume any electricity to house all of us who are surely already on Janet Napolitano’s watch lists for being members of Free Republic.

17 posted on 09/02/2009 4:21:29 AM PDT by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding; Talisker

One of Robert Heinlein’s first short stores was called “Blowups Happen” about such a project, placing an enormous breeder reactor into orbit far enough removed from the Earth so that any accident wouldn’t contaminate a continent. Power stations in orbit have always been inevitable, it’s just a matter of the tech catching up with the need.

In my daydreams I had assumed we would need the space elevator before such a project becomes feasible, mostly for the objections you state about efficiency of transmission. Then running the power down the elevator through cables. I’ll be very surprised if we have such installations before mid-century.

Another consideration for this approach is, will the world really trust that such an installation beaming gigawatts of electricity by concentrated microwave won’t weaponize the utility.


18 posted on 09/02/2009 4:40:35 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CanaGuy

It is odd, since it was Doctor O’Neill’s contention that a planetary surface was no place for a growing civilization. The Solar Power system was seen as a solution to pollution and energy needs, not a problem in and of itself.


19 posted on 09/02/2009 5:33:31 AM PDT by jmcenanly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Another consideration for this approach is, will the world really trust that such an installation beaming gigawatts of electricity by concentrated microwave won’t weaponize the utility.

LOL. I'm afraid there aren't any lines between the two. The "utility" is a down-tuned weapon, the weapon is an up-tuned utility.

That's why I think that there is no way this will become a reality. DOD couldn't allow something overhead, owned and operated by a foreign country and corporate conglomerate, that could kill (for example) everyone in the White House, or Congress, at any time, instantly.

Not gonna happen.

20 posted on 09/02/2009 5:47:04 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson