Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mountn man
I can snip YOUR words out of context with you add a phrase from the President of NAMBLA and make you look like your past time is making love to innocent goats all day long and be as silly as your last post to me, people can read through that.

Facts:
They have a boat load of kids already.
She is older and in the range to have poor health child (”what ever” illness baby).

SO:
Why be so irresponsible?
Why should the parent Duggars make choices that could have the rest of the family caring for various sickly children for life when they die?

Why not use protection and not get pregnant after a boat load of kids?
Seems to be a lot of needless risk after a lot of already healthy kids. Why not count the many blessings and be responsible in older age?

188 posted on 09/02/2009 10:25:13 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: A CA Guy
Wow such a snappy comeback. But I would surmise that the only way you could parse my words to make it look as if I make love to goats, is that you yourself are an expert on the subject, and have all the requisite knowledge, to write a tome, thereby accusing someone.

So in response to the later half of your response, what qualifies you to to deem judgment upon the Duggars that they are being irresponsible? She might be older and in the range to have a baby of poor health. Generic statistics have little bearing on personal FACTS. The facts are this woman has so far given birth to 19 children. Statistics say she's bound to have a unhealthy one. Sooo?

The Duggars are bringing their kids up to UNDERSTAND and ACCEPT personal responsibility. Sometimes that personal responsibility is not something we take on, but something that is put upon us. When these kids are older, they will be adept at personal responsibility, which the oldest boy is demonstrating quite well.

Somehow you seem to be of the impression that any child not born healthy is a curse upon the family and anyone who has to care for them. That an inconvenience on one person is irresponsibility of another.

Following your line of thinking, YOU leaving your house and driving a car, STATISTACALLY says you WILL get in an accident sooner or later. SO you driving a car, having a risk of getting in an accident and killing someone, means you are being irresponsible.

These people seem to be healthy.
They seem to meet their kids needs.
They seem to be bringing their kids up morally.
They take PERSONAL responsibility, and home school their kids. And all seem very well educated.
All kids seem to have a very high acceptance of personal responsibility. Above that of other kids their ages.

The only thing I see that seems to be irresponsible about them, is your unfounded attitude towards them.

They don't fit into your little box, and so you want to vilify them as irresponsible. You refuse to see ALL the wonderful things they do, but are waiting with baited breath for a failure, mistake, sin or loss on their part.

205 posted on 09/02/2009 12:03:19 PM PDT by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson