The easiest way to blow holes in peoples arguments is to assume the person in question did just the opposite of what they are being criticied for. Would they still be criticized?
If Romney didn’t invest in himself, what would people say?
They would say he didn’t even believe in himself, so why should we?
In other words, you are putting words down, but they don’t mean anything.
The reason I can't vote for him IS his Mormonism. The Mormon man believes too much in himself. The Mormon man thinks he can actually become (a) god, with as many wives as he desires. The wives sole role is reproduction and submission. Women have no opportunity in the Mormon economy, and can even be left behind by their man.
Anyone who can accept the Mormon concept cannot be my President. They are completely antithetical to this Christian mind, regardless of how "prety" he looks from the outside. Mormonism twists the truths of Christianity, and says they have the only way. They preach God didn't finish His plan with Jesus, and that instead, Joe Smith holds the keys to heaven.
There is only one God, and Mitt isn't He (and will never be!).
There is only one person on the Conservative side being heard loud and clear. Simply by posting on her Facebook page, she has forced Zero into a corner. Feel free to join and support her.
broncobilly (confused RomneyBOT): "The Anybody but Mitts cost us the last one."
Actually, it was Team Romney.
The McCain/Palin ticket was up ++8 pts. days prior to September 18th, 2008.
So the RomneyTeam attacked Gov. Palin and her children to throw Election2008.
Who benefits most from Sanford meltdown? Californian (that's right) Mitt Romney
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"