Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

These questions weigh on my mind. Are there others who juxtapose the two questions and wonder?
1 posted on 08/30/2009 3:24:12 PM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: MosesKnows

Its not racist, however, to them, psychologically, the fact that he’s losing more and more support among white voters at the same time he proposes things they agree with and benefits them (or at least they feel it would benefit them) makes it seem racist. It’s not that they’re arbitrarily saying its racist knowing its not, its that they truly believe it is racist, despite the fact it isn’t.


2 posted on 08/30/2009 3:27:18 PM PDT by benjibrowder (For Neda. May God bless those fighting for freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows
Why would it weigh on your mind? The answer is NO, who the hell cares what color he claims to be. Disagreement is NOT racist.
3 posted on 08/30/2009 3:27:24 PM PDT by svcw (Legalism reinforces self-righteousness - it communicates to you the good news of your own goodness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

They’ve got nothing else.

That’s why it’s “racist”


4 posted on 08/30/2009 3:28:33 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows
The massive hypocrisy of the left.
5 posted on 08/30/2009 3:28:46 PM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

I don’t disagree with the color of his skin; I disagree with the color of his Commie RED policies and agenda. :)


6 posted on 08/30/2009 3:28:53 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

Because too many white people have voted to euthanize their race.

It has become, defacto, shameful to be white in the U.S.A.


7 posted on 08/30/2009 3:29:12 PM PDT by papasmurf (RnVjayB5b3UsIDBiYW1hLCB5b3UgcGllY2Ugb2Ygc2hpdCBjb3dhcmQh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

If Blacks that oppose Obama are “uncle toms”
then whites that opposed Bush are?

Answer: Patriots!

/sarcasm


8 posted on 08/30/2009 3:29:32 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_sEazE79b5-4/SpjlCTqupaI/AAAAAAAAAFY/86QW1XdBWTg/s320/cartoon-framing-the-debate-600.jpg


9 posted on 08/30/2009 3:32:12 PM PDT by American Silver Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

It is your DUTY to oppose evil no matter what shape or form it takes.


10 posted on 08/30/2009 3:35:36 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

The answer is because you’ll back down if you’re called a racist and a black won’t.


11 posted on 08/30/2009 3:35:40 PM PDT by HIDEK6 (T.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

For the same reason that:

The NAACP is not racist, but a NAAWP would be.

The United Negro College Fund is not racist, but a he United Whitey College Fund would be.

It would be racist to give preference to white people when hiring, but not to give preference to black people through affirmative action.

The TV channel BET is not racist, but a channel called WET would be.

It’s racist to use the word “ni**er” if you’re white, but not if you’re black.

A black conservative is an Uncle Tom, but a white liberal is enlightened.

A white person that voted for McCain last year was racist, but a black person voting for Obama wasn’t.


12 posted on 08/30/2009 3:36:27 PM PDT by birdsman (NAAWP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

It’s the double standard.

As long as we continue living under the fascist PC Double Standard set up by the libtards, there will be no true advancement toward a “post-racial” society.

The heinous crimes committed in Knoxville that resulted in the first conviction last week unfortunately were not covered by the MSM because it was a horrific black on white crime. If the races had been reversed, it would have been wall to wall coverage. One AP article I read (the only national news org who said anything about the trial) mentioned that “some conservative bloggers and white supremacist groups” were upset with the lack of coverage.

Unfortunately, the first defendant got life without parole and the jury (which by the way was about half black) did not decide to impose the death penalty, although they could have.

Were the racial roles reversed, I have no doubt there’d be riots and violence, but the white families of the victims expressed their “disappointment” with the no death penalty decision.


13 posted on 08/30/2009 3:37:48 PM PDT by Canedawg (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows
Liberals would love for you to believe that an objection to Obama is a racists act. Sorry - but it's just not true. If Obama was white ( and he's just as "white" as he is "black" so that complicates it further) you would feel the same way about him going after the CIA and spending every dime we, our children and our grandchildren will ever have...

If you don't accept liberals' definitions of reality - they can't foist lies on you. Or on to us, either.

It's time to stand up to the race baiters - the professional "chip on the shoulder" guys, the "guilt trippers" and the bullshi--ers.

16 posted on 08/30/2009 3:40:43 PM PDT by GOPJ (Socialism : "Envy" gussied up as a political cause...... David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows
Here's the truth... the word "racism" has been misused so much that even those that bandy that word all the time aren't exactly sure of the meaning...

I suspect some folks just wake up in the morning and WANT to be a victim... sadly, it is a way for them to validate their existence...

18 posted on 08/30/2009 3:41:57 PM PDT by John123 (If Teddy was the lion of the senate... then we were the prey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows
Remember the beginning...
19 posted on 08/30/2009 3:43:26 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows
No, I don't wonder about it at all ~ beyond thinking about taking a Louisville Slugger to the thin skull of the idiot who came up with the idea that criticizing Obama's stupidities is racism.

You have to admit, Obama is about the stupidest man in history to serve as President. It's the dope ~ jellied his brains.

Does that every single time.

20 posted on 08/30/2009 3:43:36 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

Because Democrats are the racists. They race bait, and they put their boy in there so that they could race bait, every time someone speaks out against his policies, it makes zero, in their minds, untouchable and they can slip their entire agenda right in using that plan.

Understand, if like most Americans, the whole of America were to become truly colored blind, the Dems would be history forever. Racism holds them together, gives them their power.


22 posted on 08/30/2009 3:43:48 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

I don’t care what they say. I, you and everyone else has the right and responsibility to do what we feel is right.....regardless of color. Ignore their comments concerning race, it’s just used to divide. Won’t work this time around.


24 posted on 08/30/2009 3:46:22 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

It is racist to oppose collectivism.

It is sexist to oppose collectivism.

It’s bad for the environment to oppose collectivism.

It is selfish and materialistic to oppose collectivism.

It is isolationist and/or unilateralist to oppose collectivism.

It is stodgy, old-fashioned, and uncool to oppose collectivism.

It is stupid to oppose collectivism. Ignorant too.

It is unscientific to oppose collectivism.

It is fascistic to oppose collectivism.

It is wrong and in fact evil to oppose collectivism.

Etc.


26 posted on 08/30/2009 3:46:30 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows
I could care less about his skin color. Hell for that matter I have as much disgust for Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Barbara Boxer, Diane Fienstein, etc,etc,etc.

So...I guess that makes me a feminist hating, homophobic, white American gun toting male. Deal with it.

27 posted on 08/30/2009 3:47:10 PM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson