Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Seeks Independence With Natural Gas
BBC NEWS ^ | 2009/08/27 13:57:35 GMT | Matthew Price

Posted on 08/30/2009 1:00:33 PM PDT by kellynla

The hawk flies just above the car as it rounds the corner. It glides through the trees, and comes to rest on a branch.

Around the next corner, the road opens out into a fold between the hills. An old farmhouse and barn sits up slightly to the left.

This is rural Pennsylvania - lush, green, and refreshingly cooler than the humid east coast at this time of year.

And hidden underneath all this beauty, a natural resource that could answer the US's energy prayers.

Around another small hill, and along a gravel track, sits a gas platform. It is drilling down into what is the largest natural gas field to be discovered in the US.

'Energy independence'

The company drilling here is Range Resources, and according to its vice-president, Stephen Rupert, natural gas could help break this country's dependence on foreign oil.

"Natural gas is our cleanest fossil fuel. It can be used in cars, to generate electricity. It can be liquefied and used as jet aviation fuel," he says.

Then comes the killer comment, as far as US politics is concerned right now: "The natural gas that's being used in this country at this time can really get us to energy independence."

(Excerpt) Read more at newsvote.bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: energy; naturalgas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

1 posted on 08/30/2009 1:00:33 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

And methane is less carbon-laden than any other naturally occurring fossil fuel for the unit energy it puts out when burned. The global warming people should be glad wherever it can be put to use instead of oil. But environuts seldom think straight.


2 posted on 08/30/2009 1:04:44 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Barack Obama is a political suicide bomber and the Rats are political arsonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Probably never occurred to them we could just drill for oil, and build a few nuclear power plants.


3 posted on 08/30/2009 1:05:33 PM PDT by Tarpon (The Joker's plan -- Slavery by debt so large it can never be repaid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Why not drill both oil and natural gas?We have plenty of both.


4 posted on 08/30/2009 1:07:14 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

No thanks. I can barely afford my winter heat bills as it is. I don’t need demand increased tenfold.


5 posted on 08/30/2009 1:07:44 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

They thought the closing of Yucca Mountain was the death knell for nukes. Little did they consider that France, for one example, has a pretty efficient little nuclear “waste” recycling program going on. The “waste” can be kept in a small area at the nuclear plant that created it. From a terrorism danger point of view, it’s better to move the “waste” as little as possible than to constantly carry it across the country in an oversize truck which might as well have “KICK ME” painted on its side.


6 posted on 08/30/2009 1:10:11 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Barack Obama is a political suicide bomber and the Rats are political arsonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
New drilling technologies are opening up huge new fields of natural gas.

I think there's another one in the south of the US that doubles our known reserves, just by itself.

7 posted on 08/30/2009 1:10:15 PM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

If supply soars to match, it’s a wash.


8 posted on 08/30/2009 1:12:09 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Barack Obama is a political suicide bomber and the Rats are political arsonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
I don't see supply increasing tenfold or more in a reasonable time period as a likely scenario.

We need to start running a significant portion of our vehicles on something other than oil. I don't see NG as a viable alternative for the price.
9 posted on 08/30/2009 1:15:20 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Recycling the waste requires movement across the country.


10 posted on 08/30/2009 1:18:33 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

Propane handles better (it will liquify without requiring the enormous pressures needed to liquify methane at room temperature).

If surpluses of natural gas can be had (it’s often less messy than oil to drill for) then these can be used to feed generators if nothing better.


11 posted on 08/30/2009 1:18:36 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Barack Obama is a political suicide bomber and the Rats are political arsonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Naw, they know, they just hoped you didn't. The spent fuel is the real dangerous problem, and as you say, if it weren't for a congressional law, we could reuse it too.

Kind of like the joke with DDT being harmful, and we are out of oil.

After a while, you want to just say ‘stop lying’.

12 posted on 08/30/2009 1:18:52 PM PDT by Tarpon (The Joker's plan -- Slavery by debt so large it can never be repaid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nomad
I'm for oil, natural gas, and we have enough coal for 300 HUNDRED YEARS! While we're doing that, lets start building co-generation nuclear power plants offshore that not only provide electricity but ALL the potable water we will EVER need!
13 posted on 08/30/2009 1:18:58 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Even in France? Is this a regulatory requirement or an engineering necessity?


14 posted on 08/30/2009 1:19:44 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Barack Obama is a political suicide bomber and the Rats are political arsonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
If supply soars to match, it’s a wash.

Demand increases >> Prices increase >> Supply Increases. Econ 101.

15 posted on 08/30/2009 1:20:15 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Even in France? Is this a regulatory requirement or an engineering necessity?

Both. Plants do not have the equipment or experties and we don't want rouge entities reprocessing (can siphon off weapons grade materials).

16 posted on 08/30/2009 1:21:51 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Coal is a global warmist’s nightmare.

Personally, I can’t see any of the studies to date as showing that we can either out-cool or out-warm “Mother Nature” in any significant way.


17 posted on 08/30/2009 1:22:07 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Barack Obama is a political suicide bomber and the Rats are political arsonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Alaska has a thousand year supply of methane.. maybe more..
Federal land cannot even be prospected on.. which is most of Alaska... The amazing thing is off the east coast of the US.. nobody knows what energy deposits are there.. NOBODY.. Could be more than Calif or off Texas and Louisiana.. OH! and Florida.. or even the Dakotas.. Then theres the OIL sands..
18 posted on 08/30/2009 1:23:42 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Rogues have thus far found it easier to smuggle hot stuff out of discombobulated countries that can’t even count their own fingers and toes (e.g. members of the old USSR) or to gin up their own nuclear fuel (e.g. Iran, North Korea). A U.S. plant reprocessing its own fuel would be a comparatively difficult site to rob.


19 posted on 08/30/2009 1:25:23 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Barack Obama is a political suicide bomber and the Rats are political arsonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
""Natural gas is our cleanest fossil fuel. It can be used in cars, to generate electricity. It can be liquefied and used as jet aviation fuel," he says."

It's not that clean. With natural gas comes sour gas, and that stuff is deadly, and a huge problem around all natural gas drilling areas. A small town, or anyone on a farm downwind from a blowout could end up very sick with all sorts of health problems if they got a whiff of that stuff.

20 posted on 08/30/2009 1:26:40 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson