This is true. However, unless the person in question makes a public repudiation of his wrongs, there can be no public funeral Mass. And under no circumstances should a radical leftist Muslim be invited to give a "eulogy" in a Catholic basilica at a funeral Mass for this person, either.
As a Catholic I didn't take any offense in what took place yesterday. Remember -- this was the same Archdiocese of Boston that made a habit out of sheltering sexual predators among its clergy for decades. That entire place has effectively written itself off as far as I'm concerned.
***This is true. However, unless the person in question makes a public repudiation of his wrongs, there can be no public funeral Mass. And under no circumstances should a radical leftist Muslim be invited to give a “eulogy” in a Catholic basilica at a funeral Mass for this person, either.***
Thank you for your reply. You’ve taught me something about my church that I didn’t know. I am confused, though, about PUBLIC funeral Mass versus private. Does that mean that when there is a doubt as to whether the deceased is known to have broken the rules of the church a parish Mass confined perhaps to only the family and close associates can be held, but NOT a public Mass such as Ted Kennedy had? It was certainly VERY PUBLIC.
I agree, also, that Obama should not have been allowed to speak at the funeral.