Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Noncognitive Assessment Farce
Townhall.com ^ | August 28, 2009 | La Shawn Barber

Posted on 08/29/2009 9:18:45 AM PDT by Kaslin

Colleges and universities either prohibited by law from factoring race into admissions decisions, or those that prefer a subtler approach to admitting applicants based on race, do so by measuring personality, leadership qualities, life experiences, creativity, resilience, and other "noncognitive" factors.

According to a story in the Wall Street Journal, some schools claim that using noncognitive assessments are improving minorities' odds of admission. No kidding? Northeastern University in Boston has gone so far as to develop the Torch Scholars Program to assess "leadership potential" and evaluate how an applicant has "overcome adversity." As expected, average SAT scores for the program's so-called scholars are 200 points below the typical student.

Oregon State University requires applicants to answer a loaded question about facing or witnessing discrimination, a convenient way for the applicant to reveal his race.

The Educational Testing Service (ETS) has jumped on the bandwagon. The ETS, which administers the Graduate Record Examination, added a "personal potential index" for schools to consider in addition to standardized scores.

It's one thing if schools assessed these qualities in all applicants equally; it's quite another if schools give these qualities more weight when it comes to minority students. Why would having so-called leadership qualities, creativity, resilience, and a sparkling personality benefit minority applicants in particular? Wouldn't these traits be found in whites and Asians in equal or greater measure?

The answers are obvious, but let's pretend they're not. Consider the following:

In his highly recommended Human Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950, Charles Murray compiled an inventory of 4,002 significant figures over 2,750 years who pursued excellence and accomplished great things in the arts and sciences. His inventory overwhelmingly consists of white European males, as do other authoritative and respected inventories.

Murray made the case that no significant non-European figures and events had been omitted from the major inventories. What was known about great works of other cultures was included, and it was white Europeans who did the research and tried to preserve the records of those accomplishments, not non-European cultures.

In response to charges that European accomplishment in the sciences are exaggerated and that sources used to compile inventories are biased against non-European countries (about 97 percent of significant figures and events in the sciences are Western), Murray encouraged critics to augment the list of "giants" with non-Europeans, with one caveat: You must use the same rules by which European figures and events were included. He wrote:

"If the definition of 'significant event' or 'significant person' is relaxed to permit a dozen new non-European entries, hundreds of new entries will qualify for the European list, and the relative proportions assigned to Europe and non-Europe will not change. They may become more extreme, because the reservoir of non-trivial European accomplishment that did not get into the inventory is so immense."

In the same manner, colleges and universities that measure noncognitive qualities must apply the same rules to all applicants. If standards are relaxed to permit more minority admissions, more whites and Asians would qualify. If the relaxed standards increase only minority admissions, the noncognitive assessments are proxies for race, plain and simple.

"Colleges and universities should forget about race and ethnicity and focus simply on admitting the best students," said Roger Clegg, president and general counsel of the Center for Equal Opportunity. "That doesn't mean that they can't try to find diamonds in the rough, but those diamonds come in all colors."

Measuring noncognitive qualities is not objectionable per se. The intent behind the measuring can be objectionable. "If schools honestly believe that considering a particular factor will enable them better to select the best students," Clegg said, "then fine – but they should consider that factor for all students, and weigh it regardless of skin color or national origin. And if schools are considering a factor because they think it will result in more students of one color being chosen or fewer students of another color, then they are engaging in discrimination."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/29/2009 9:18:45 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Tain’t new. How else would the Obamaloon make through any college, let alone Harvard?

Does anyone think for a millisecond that that clown even remotely competed with really good law students for the editor of the law review?

If you believe that, you believe that Al Gore actually knows something about climate.


2 posted on 08/29/2009 9:42:07 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Oregon State University requires applicants to answer a loaded question about facing or witnessing discrimination

I'm sure OSU has data to show this is a powerful tool to predict freshman year grades, just like HS GPA and the SAT.

/sarc

3 posted on 08/29/2009 10:00:29 AM PDT by freespirited (The only thing growing faster than the deficit is Chris Matthews' man crush on Obama -- Tim Pawlenty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The US Naval Academy, under orders from Obama, reserved 1/3 of the seats in the class of 2013 for “women and minorities.” These reservees average far below other refused applicants on SATs, grades, physical fitness, and achievement. In four years these losers will be commanding US sailors.


4 posted on 08/29/2009 11:32:03 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

btt


5 posted on 08/29/2009 12:46:43 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

“If you believe that, you believe that Al Gore actually knows something about climate.”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Al Gore knows something about climate, he has never been known to vacation in Siberia or Death Valley. He still has a home in Tennessee, doesn’t he? Of course if you mean any understanding of what causes warming or cooling, no, he hasn’t a clue.


6 posted on 08/29/2009 1:01:00 PM PDT by RipSawyer (Change has come to America and all hope is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The American “educational” system is the second biggest farce in the world...right behind American “finance”


7 posted on 08/29/2009 2:19:49 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
The original evaluation of Head Start, which was done by Stanford Research Institute in the early seventies, found that Head Start added nothing to the cognitive performance of students past the first or second grade. So they added an evaluation of "noncognitive" factors, which at the time meant vague and unreliable measures of things like "self-esteem" and probably the same stew of claptrap they are using now for college. Head start didn't add anything to "Noncog" factors either. It turned out the only value of Head Start was as a jobs program for the welfare mothers it hired as "childcare assistants."

The only value of this "program" will be if it keeps a few gangbangers off the streets and lowers the crime rate a bit.

8 posted on 08/29/2009 3:44:53 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson