Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bluedressman
my point was that the presence of his children is enough to make an annulment a sham.

Your point seems to be that you are ignorant of the difference between a civil annulment and a church annulment.

801 posted on 08/29/2009 12:57:55 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 724 | View Replies ]


To: maryz

I just read on another thread that the Vatican overturned the Church annulment of Joe Kennedy, Jr. and his wife, Sheila. Never heard that before.


822 posted on 08/29/2009 2:26:06 PM PDT by EDINVA (A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 801 | View Replies ]

To: maryz

whatever. he was given the annulment so he could re-marry. that is not a valid reason. your point seems to be on the top of your head.


840 posted on 08/29/2009 4:06:54 PM PDT by bluedressman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 801 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson