To: kellynla
There actually may be a local law that states a protestor cannot bear a sign with a picture on school property. It would be interesting to hear from someone in the area that knows for sure.
To: traderrob6
There actually may be a local law that states a protestor cannot bear a sign with a picture on school property. It would be interesting to hear from someone in the area that knows for sure.
I seriously want to know what the local laws are here. If Cheeks stated in error then this is huge. If he stated correctly the protester on our side looks like a jackass.
Will someone please conform and, or state the local laws.
To: traderrob6
There actually may be a local law that states a protestor cannot bear a sign with a picture on school property. It would be interesting to hear from someone in the area that knows for sure.Even if that is the case, there needs to be some kind of binding official ruling that says that Constitutional limitations which apply while school is in session AS A SCHOOL, apply at no other time. Or alternatively, that public meetings cannot be held at a school.
Otherwise the tyrants have a simply workaround to Constitutional freedom, simply hold your meetings at some site where the Constitution doesn't apply. Next we'll see them holding them at airports and quashing dissent using rules specifically targeted at airport and flight security. This obviously should not be allowed to stand.
62 posted on
08/29/2009 10:55:35 AM PDT by
Still Thinking
(If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson