The decision, as presented, was based on the religious exposure of the child, and the limitation thereof. It violates our constitution.
Especially knowing the child is being educated partially in the public schools!
The dad did this to be spiteful. How about that!
You don't understand Family Law. This is a dispute between private citizens and not a dispute between the State and an individual.
It doesn't matter if religion is part of the mix, the court has jurisdiction, just as they would have jurisdiction over a dispute over whether the child was going to go to a fundamentalist Islamic madrassa or a public school if the Father was a christian and the mother was a fundamentalist Muslim.
If the mother were a fundamentalist Muslim who wanted the child to go to an Islamic Madrassa and the Father who was a Christian convert wanted the child to go to public school, how would you rule?