[P-Marlowe]

The decision, as presented, was based on the religious exposure of the child, and the limitation thereof. It violates our constitution.

You don't understand Family Law. This is a dispute between private citizens and not a dispute between the State and an individual.

It doesn't matter if religion is part of the mix, the court has jurisdiction, just as they would have jurisdiction over a dispute over whether the child was going to go to a fundamentalist Islamic madrassa or a public school if the Father was a christian and the mother was a fundamentalist Muslim.

If the mother were a fundamentalist Muslim who wanted the child to go to an Islamic Madrassa and the Father who was a Christian convert wanted the child to go to public school, how would you rule?

[ican'tbelieveit]

In favor of the parent who has custody.