Without the whole story, you are making very telling judgments of your own.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2326201/posts
and she is now living with her mother who has been homeschooling the child since first grade. As part of the schooling, the young girl has been attending supplemental public school classes.
The girl is not being indoctrinated 24x7; she is being exposed to the public school environment already.
Nobody has the "whole story". My point is simply that when there is a divorce, the courts are called on to resolve disputes between the parents and to ultimately decide what is in the best interest of the child. This ruling is not applicable to home schooled children in general, but to this home schooled child in particular. The mother does not have the right to home school the child unless the father agrees. If there is a dispute about where the child is to attend school, then, where the family law courts have jurisdiction over the child, then the courts will make that decision.
They did it in this case. There is always one party that leaves Family Court angry. This time it was the mother.