Skip to comments.
Idaho GOP hopeful jokes about 'Obama Tags'
Newsvine/AP ^
| 8/27/09
| staff
Posted on 08/27/2009 5:15:41 PM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: pissant
Heck, it could help him in Idaho, but only if he doesnt grovel and apologize like the ball-less wimp from Virginia I agree. I like George Allen, but his incessant apologizing after "macaca" made him look weak. He should've said this: "Offending Mr. Sidarth was not my intention, but I do regret it if that was the case." And he should've never broached the subject again. He kept it in the headlines by apologizing everytime he saw a microphone.
21
posted on
08/27/2009 6:48:50 PM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(I remember Jack Kennedy... Jack Kennedy was a President of mine.. and Teddy, you're no Jack Kennedy!)
To: pissant
That’s his only way out of this.
Je should say he’s put in a call to Cheney to join him.
22
posted on
08/27/2009 6:49:13 PM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(Overproduction, one of the top five worries for the American farmer.)
To: Carley
I live in Idaho Falls. Rex is a douchebag of the highest order. Runs for everything and usually brings in about 2% Rex, please go back to milking elk.
To: txrangerette
Agreed, a bad mistake. I think you can classify his running for Gov as: “so much for that idea”.
To: patriot08
25
posted on
08/27/2009 10:46:26 PM PDT
by
TNdandelion
(I'd rather have FedEx run my healthcare than USPS.)
To: patriot08
26
posted on
08/27/2009 10:46:40 PM PDT
by
TNdandelion
(I'd rather have FedEx run my healthcare than USPS.)
To: OneVike
Excellent. And the comments look mostly favorable to you as well. One guy said, “One question for PS, who is Chuck Ness and John Sergeant? Are they new writers for you? I only ask because they are good, and so you should keep them.” So good for you.
To: TheOldLady; Alex Murphy; SendShaqtoIraq; ChicagahAl; SandRat; mia; HiTech RedNeck; SolidWood; ...
I recently posted a thread that I pinged my list about an article that was critical of a write-up about Hugh Hefner. The write-up claimed that Hugh Hefner was a moral individual. I posted thread, then a few moments after I pinged you all that I posted the anti-Hugh Hefner thread, this is what cam up.
This thread has been pulled.
|
Pulled on 08/28/2009 5:48:55 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Not appropriate for FR. |
Okay
Now I sent 8 personal freep-mails demanding the reason for the removal, but as of me sending this I have yet to receive an answer. It is my wish that if you care as to why they would pull a thread that was decent yet critical of the Porn King, Hugh Hefner, who I personally think is not moral, nor even the bit decent, you would send the moderator or Jim a Freep mail as to why they would pull it. Again, I humbly ask you all to send a freep-mail to the admn moderator as to why they pulled the ANT-HUGH HEFNER thread.
Your Brother in Christ
One Vike
28
posted on
08/28/2009 6:49:34 PM PDT
by
OneVike
(Just a Christian waiting to go home)
To: TheOldLady
Excellent. And the comments look mostly favorable to you as well. One guy said, One question for PS, who is Chuck Ness and John Sergeant? Are they new writers for you? I only ask because they are good, and so you should keep them. So good for you.
Thanks for the heads up on my hometown blog. I have been so busy today at work that I did not have a chance to look. Then I went FR to post an article critical of Hugh Hefner and it was pulled by a moderator. What is going on????
I guess I know better then to ask that question. We do live in trying times, and we will all be tested, even by those we thought we could trust.
Again thanks for the compliment, I have felt lately that it just does not matter, but then God sends someone like you to encourage me on. God bless you and yours.
OV
29
posted on
08/28/2009 7:02:10 PM PDT
by
OneVike
(Just a Christian waiting to go home)
To: TheOldLady
You, ma'am, have earned your tag. ;^)
30
posted on
08/28/2009 7:20:33 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
To: OneVike
What publication was it in?
That could be the problem ...a lot of publications they won’t allow here, even if articles could be in the “know your enemies” category.
Private site, what can you do?
31
posted on
08/28/2009 8:59:26 PM PDT
by
Lorianne
To: OneVike
I wouldn’t worry about it. The mods can and do pull stuff if they don’t like it.
32
posted on
08/28/2009 10:20:21 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: TigersEye
Thank you. Proudly displayed.
To: OneVike
Sorry I didn’t answer you sooner, but we had some hecka thunderstorms yesterday and through the night, so intermittent/no Internet, and trouble falling asleep. It rained 1.1,” and that was before midnight.
This is a private site, and the owner and the moderators are in complete control of the content. As a member in good conservative standing, there’s no reason why you can’t petition them to know the reason for pulling the thread, but that’s about it. You could FReepmail the link to your ping list, and each person can decide whether they want to read it, or give the site a hit, or not.
To: OneVike
Now I sent 8 personal freep-mails demanding [...] Might I suggest "inquiring" next time?
35
posted on
08/29/2009 7:04:08 AM PDT
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: OneVike
One correction to it...he made PFC.
36
posted on
08/29/2009 7:09:46 AM PDT
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: pissant; OneVike
I wouldnt worry about it. The mods can and do pull stuff if they dont like it. Heck, during election season, we had moderator defacing of original posts--including in the original article area--with quotes from sources that flat-out said on their website that their purpose was to fight the Right!
37
posted on
08/29/2009 7:24:44 AM PDT
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: TheOldLady
LOL You earned it. Hand wringers need not apply.
38
posted on
08/29/2009 10:33:03 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson