Posted on 08/27/2009 10:21:54 AM PDT by TexasGunRunner
Back during the 2008 Iowa Cacuses, a rumor was circulated the night before that Fred Thompson was going to pull out of the race.
During an interview the next day, Thompson said he knew who was behind it, but refused to discuss beyond saying it cost him "a couple of points".
I understand during the election, nobody was going to admit who did it, certainly not until after November. OK, November came, went, and now the socialist-in-chief has everybody distracted, so, I ask:
who did it?
The problem is that the primary dates are set by the individual states, even though the parties do not have to seat the delgates, see the dem debacle with Michigan and Florida. Trying to get 50 state legislatures to work together seems almost impossible. And I can’t imagine that anything coming out of D.C. would be less than a nightmare, ignoring the fact that they don’t constitutionally have the right.
Like the old saying goes: None of us is as dumb as all of us.
For what it's worth: the smartest, most well-connected old-school newspaperman in Washington was Robert Novak, and he had reason to believe that Mitt Romney's people were, at the time purposely trying to create a wedge between Mr. Thompson and John McCain.
He published his thoughts on the matter in his column of 1/5/08, and having read his work for over 30 years, I inferred between the lines that he had a good source informing his suspicion. He almost always did.
Not likely McCain. In withdrawing, Thompson threw his support behind McCain. They’d been colleagues in the Senate. Whatever can be said of him, backstabbing isn’t his style ... he’ll attack frontally. THO, he had some pretty nasty staffers, ask Gov Palin.
ut aLL WORKED OUT JUST AS THE BIG $ BOYS WANTED IT TO WORK OUT, NO MATTER HOW MUCH WE SQUABBLE HERE ON FR.
If you remember some states threatened to move their primary dates ahead of Iowa. Maybe that’s the only way to get the RNC’s attention.
Except for the absurd part I agree 100% with you. Fred could have easily beaten McCain. Recall, Fred was also a great friend of McCain. Fred's campaign efforts were beyond lack luster. They were awful. He finally "hit his stride" a short time before McCain locked up the nomination. Far too late to be effective. If Fred had campaigned hard from the git go he would have won the nomination and I believe the White House. H@ll, I would have voted for him. We were taken for a ride, simple as that.
Refuse to see what? Why don’t you enlighten us blind folks?
Mission impossible! :)
The only viciousness is coming from you. Who were you supporting? I was for Fred until he left. Romney is far from “power-mad” as you assert. Back it up with facts, rvoitier.
The funny thing about that conventional ‘wisdom’ is that it is completely laughable on it’s face. Why would a man leave a high paying job and a nice life to go farting around on busses for 6 months if he didn’t want the job? Say he ran a crappy campaign. That, I’ll buy. But this ‘didn’t want the job’ bunk is ridiculous. Almost as ridiculous as the idea of leaving the cushy position of being Paul Harvey’s replacement AND a high paying TV gig to go screw around and get SOMEONE ELSE the damn nomination. The idea that supposedly intelligent people believe this stuff is an indictment of our public education system.
We are in a battle for the future of this country, and you want to rehash old facts? I wanted Fred too, but this is a waste of time. Let go and move forward.
Post an image, or prove yourself to be a liar.
I think at some level Fred did want the job. Perhaps he just looked at the tasks before him and weighed the risks and probabilities and decided it wasn’t going to happen. He’s a smart man. But he knew that he didn’t have the support of the big “early money” guys and the “prestige” advisers he would need. Maybe he didn’t want to put his wife through the kind of crap that less thoughtful people with bigger egos don’t care about. And I do believe that he was sabotaged, because I’ve worked on campaigns, and I’ve seen it up close and ugly.
I assume eventually some state will move their primary to the first Wednesday after the first Monday in November on years that are evenly divisible by four.
This does not go very well with the theory that Fred was only running because his ambitious wife MADE him do it.
Here in Iowa, we heard several rumors as to who started it. Nothing was able to be substantiated by any sources I trust.
I don’t believe for a second that a man of Fred’s character would run because his wife made him do it.
I think he definitely was sabotaged and I think he had an idea that if he was going to do this, he was going to do it ‘his way’ and either we’d go with him or we wouldn’t. I think he was doomed no matter what he did, because there were too many knives out for him on our own side. The Fox News people were brutal to him.
It’s all water under the bridge now. But I detest the Romney people to this day.
I agree that when the conservative contributors, ACU, National Review, and the religious right all withheld support, it was not encouraging. The religious right went with Huckabee, and NRO and the ACU followed the money to Romney.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.