Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gordon Greene

Well, unnecessary mutilation of genitals to appease a god is pretty backward, however much one might want to spin the barbarity.


141 posted on 08/24/2009 10:22:47 PM PDT by OldSpice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: OldSpice

Spin it how you like, but God was not just looking for a gift of appeasement. The laws and restrictions that were laid down to follow in the scriptures were more obviously related to preserving the people and their health than to appeasing God. The problem here is that the people were backward in the ways of health and self preservation in a lot of respects. The New Testament made it clear that a lot of the restrictions that were given were no longer necessary (like in what we could and could not eat). It’s also true that by then the ability to prepare food, cleanliness and health / medicine had also advanced. This is my own interpretation, but the texts support it.

You’re inability to see or understand a thing does not make it untrue... and a British accent, contrary to Hollywood’s presentation of it, does not prove one’s intelligence.

Just so you know, I have a British accent in my head so when I’m typing it does makes me feel smarter.

And, last night I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express.


143 posted on 08/25/2009 6:16:19 PM PDT by Gordon Greene (www.fracturedrepublic.com - Jesus said, "I am THE way, THE truth and THE life." Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson