[MHGinTN]

"Abstinent gays are tempted in a different way, as long as they do not fall into temptation and ACT on their lust, they should be allowed to serve." So says the gay apologist, SeekAndFind.

You are missing the point of the exchange, it would appear on purpose: sexual degeneracy is a lifestyle choice; the truly regenerated soul will not seek to identify itself by the sexual proclivities which drove the life before Christ's Grace, so if the sexual degenerate still seeks to be identified by the previous degeneracy, that soul is not regenerated.

You really ought to try Jesus, he is the Soter, the Deliverer from evil. Homosexuality as a choice is evil. You can be delivered from evil. That's why Jesus took upon himself a body, suffered and died, then rose again from the tomb.

Peddle your tolerance for evil to someone else, I will not compromise with you and the sexual degenerates.

[SeekAndFind]

Homosexuality as a choice is evil. You can be delivered from evil.

I NEVER said homosexuality was not EVIL. I did say that there are DIFFERENT MANIFESTATIONS of evil, homosexual lust being one of them. But so is heterosexual lust.

If one is tempted but does NOT CHOOSE to give in to the temptation, one does not sin. Therefore I don't understand the one-sided condemnation of clergy who are tempted by homosexual lust and on the other hand, forgetting the clergy who are likewise tempted by heterosexual lust. Giving in to either one of them are PERSONAL CHOICES.

Is Jim Baker's adultery with a woman any less reprehensible than Ted Haggard's lying with a male prostitute ?

Both are abomination to the Lord.

That's why Jesus took upon himself a body, suffered and died, then rose again from the tomb.

Since I believe this like you do, I have no further comments regarding this statement.