Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 08bil98z24

the difference is that guns in the hands of civilians cut crime.
Putting more drug addicts on the street causes crime.

i have no clue what the WOD is. I am all for the constitution, less government involvement.

What do you think meth users, lsd users and crack users do for a living?

You think that these are recreational drugs?

get a grip.
read crime statistics.

I refuse to have tyhis conversation with a person who is just all happy about pot being legal, which obviously you are. This has nothing to do with an invasion of rights.

It has everything to do with a bunch of drug addicts committing burglary, larceny and robbery to feed their habits.


82 posted on 08/21/2009 9:30:36 AM PDT by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Munz

Bullwhack!

If drugs were legal, a serious heroin or cocaine habit would cost up to $10/day! Marijuana even less.

Recycling beer-cans can support that sort of vice.


85 posted on 08/21/2009 9:38:02 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: Munz
First off, statistics can be manipulated to make any point. The same is true of polls.

i have no clue what the WOD is.

WOD = War on Drugs.

I am all for the constitution, less government involvement.

The constitution does not support scheduling laws, and the War on Drugs has created more government involvment.

It has everything to do with a bunch of drug addicts committing burglary, larceny and robbery to feed their habits.

Liberals say that about gun restriction. Its the same load of BS.

If you comit burglary, larceny, or robbery you go to jail.

Possesion of a drug is not a crime, nor should it ever have been a crime. It has to do with that thing called LIBERTY AND FREEDOM.

Get it through your head: Prohibtion did not work, Drug laws do not work.

97 posted on 08/21/2009 10:26:06 AM PDT by 08bil98z24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: Munz
I am all for the constitution, less government involvement.

Do you think the Wickard decision, which expanded the scope of the Commerce Clause during FDR's reign, is consistent with the clause's original meaning... yes or no?

124 posted on 08/21/2009 12:44:48 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: Munz

It has EVERYTHING to do with invasion of rights by government. It has everything to do with tearing up the Constitution for EVERYONE in the name of “protecting” some from themselves by killing them or jailing them because they use the UNAPPROVED recreational substances. It is the police checkpoints and “Your papers, if you please (or even if you don’t)” for EVERYONE in the name of the war on some drugs. It is the trashing of the Fourth amendment in particular and the militarization of cops and the busting in the wrong doors in the middle of the night and killing and maiming INNOCENTS in the name of the WOsD. It is a Liberal’s wetdream of control handed them by so-called “conservatives” and YOU have a LOT to answer for.


126 posted on 08/21/2009 12:45:52 PM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: Munz
It has everything to do with a bunch of drug addicts committing burglary, larceny and robbery to feed their habits.

And why are their habits so expensive to feed? Could it be that the black market drove up the prices because they were illicit?
130 posted on 08/21/2009 1:02:47 PM PDT by bamahead (Avoid self-righteousness like the devil- nothing is so self-blinding. -- B.H. Liddell Hart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson