Do you think the Wickard decision, which expanded the scope of the Commerce Clause during FDR's reign, is consistent with the clause's original meaning... yes or no?
May I answer that question? I would say mot "NO", but instead I would say
IMO, the Wickard decision practically eviscerated the 10th Amendment by judicial fiat...& BOTH Democrats & Republicans have jumped on this w/ glee whenever it suited their purposes.