They just had to let us Hegel over it first.
Why use extremes of differences rather than less extreme ones? Because, as we know from other forms of engineering, the greater the polarity the easier to overcome resistance. They who wish to drive social change to their advantage see well the potential in entertaining extreme differences so that they may achieve smaller ones (theirs) along the way.< snip >1. How this game works is that the players have placed what they want in the path of the extremists.This is why the idea of backing extremists is such a delightfully subtle tool of social engineers. If an extremist does not already exist where needed, they will manufacture a crisis to make sure one will materialize.
2. Extremists are counted on to make demands on the rest of society that certainly will be met with resistance.
3. The game player's front men then step forward to offer "a compromise" to the wishes of the extremists that the resisters will accept.
Do you now understand how social engineers manipulate factions and fears? This health care "crisis" bears all the earmarks for political paybacks of social engineers.
We are suckers to accept ANY compromise at this time. The fight must continue even as the RINOs whom we would be foolish to believe are our watchdogs on this are preparing to accept any offer made by the WH.