I consider what they want to do with senior citizens a form of genocide. Take that dimoKKKRATS.
He does not care. He is sure he can win with illegals, SEIU/ACORN, voter fraud, minorities, unions and liberals.
He does not care for seniors. I bet AARP is watching in horror. He also thinks he can fool enough seniors.
If I were a senior - I would be shocked but the ones who voted for him have no clue.
Baby boomers better wake up because their euthanasia red letter day with an ACORN govt health “expert” will not be far away.
President Carter didn’t armtwist the networks to be on for free, FOUR TIMES in six months and NOT TAKE NO for an answer.
Carter didn’t keep on in CAMPAIGN MODE after he was in the White House.
Carter kept his mouth shut more and showed himself less of a fool than Obama, by opening his more and more, going off script and confirming to the world he is one.
yitbos
Did y’all hear the parody by white comedian Paul Shanklin on Rush?
“Old people got, no reason... Old people got, no reason...”
The tragic thing is, that there are so many of these ‘seniors’ that voted for this monster/madman/dictator because they are (were?) diehard-democrats. I was behind an elderly man yesterday in Aldis, God Bless him, he must have been 90-95 years old, once a proud man no doubt; had his ‘slacks’ and ‘white’ shirt on and was moving incredibly slow as he was unloading his cart. It was a huge effort for him to pull each item out but he finally got it done. He had no bags in which to pack his considerable amount and as he was exiting, I happen to be behind him. He was truly ‘shuffling’ as his cane hung on the cart handle. Well I couldn’t stand it and had to ask if he wanted a hand to which he replied, “No Ma’am, thank you ma’am” so I left him, got in my jeep and as I drove by him, he had “OUT OF IRAQ NOW” and “OBAMA” stickers on his car. And I just thought it so sad because he’s toast if this plan goes through.....as many others will be. But in spite of ALL the warnings.....they still voted for this monster and now look at what they are facing! (Sorry for the length of this)
Special Olympians
“We are not talking about cutting Medicare benefits,” Obama said”
LIAR!
Democrats want elderly people on the streets eating dog food!
Maureen Dowd calls townhall attendees
“OLD WHITE MALCONTENTS.”
August 12, 2009
Op-Ed Columnist
Toilet-Paper Barricades
By MAUREEN DOWD
WASHINGTON
“...Instead of a multicultural tableau of beaming young idealists on screen, we see ugly scenes of mostly older and white malcontents, disrupting forums where others have come to actually learn something. Instead of hope, we get swastikas, death threats and T-shirts proclaiming “Proud Member of the Mob.””
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/12/opinion/12dowd.html?hpw
Obama’s answer will be to put senior citizens in retraints.
Medicare Nonpayment, Hospital Falls, and Unintended Consequences
Sharon K. Inouye, M.D., M.P.H., Cynthia J. Brown, M.D., and Mary E. Tinetti, M.D.
“Of greatest concern is that the heightened focus on fall prevention will probably have unintended consequences. If hospitals are scrutinized for the occurrence of falls, the natural tendency will be to focus on such events even at the expense of competing (and perhaps more important) outcomes. Unintended consequences are likely to include a decrease in mobility and a resurgence in the use of physical restraints in a misguided effort to prevent fall-related injuries. Physical restraints have long been used because they are believed to prevent falls. Studies have shown, however, that not only do they not reduce the risk of falls or related injuries, but they are associated with increased rates of complications, including immobility, functional loss, delirium, agitation, pressure sores (which are themselves one of the nonreimbursible hospital-acquired conditions), asphyxiation, and death.2 Moreover, accumulating evidence suggests that restraints may actually increase the risk of falling or sustaining an injury from a fall.3
Manufacturers are taking advantage of the increased interest in fall prevention by marketing new devices. Chairs that are difficult to get out of, enclosed beds, and a wide array of bed alarms — even sock alarms — are meant to circumvent guidelines against the use of traditional restraints. But as devices intended to inhibit free movement, they should be subjected to the same regulations that apply to any other restraints.”
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/360/23/2390