Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Low-income kids report first sexual intercourse at 12 years old in new ISU study
Iowa State University ^ | 08/12/2009 | Mike Ferlazzo

Posted on 08/12/2009 7:12:14 PM PDT by iowamark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Low income teens in Chicago, Boston, and San Antonio.

I think a lot of adults are in the dark about the extreme sexualization of America's teens.

1 posted on 08/12/2009 7:12:15 PM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Just so long as they’re using taxpayer funded condoms it’s all ok....


2 posted on 08/12/2009 7:15:10 PM PDT by freebilly ( No wonder all the left has a boner for Obama.... There's "Cialis" in "SoCIALISt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
Someone will be along soon to say "it's always been that way".

But it hasn't always been that way.

3 posted on 08/12/2009 7:15:46 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
"It can be that mothers have better paying jobs and more stable home environment and they're less likely to be in stressful circumstances. It could also be that mothers then have greater cognitive capacities to sort of sit down and discuss the pros and cons of waiting to have sex until you're older."

Or it could be that spiritual poverty often leads to physical poverty.

4 posted on 08/12/2009 7:20:56 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Obama is in way over his ears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
A friend of mine from many years back grew up on a small rather remote farm. They had the usual assortment of livestock. I kid you not, his nickname was “cowbanger”. I think I was about 12 at the time when stupidly asked him one day how he got that nickname. He said, “We all tried it”!
5 posted on 08/12/2009 7:21:18 PM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; brytlea

ping


6 posted on 08/12/2009 7:22:41 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

just EEWWWWWWWWWWWWWUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.


7 posted on 08/12/2009 7:35:16 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

They probably are. I taught sex ed (9th graders) in TX for about 5 years starting in 2000. These kids thought they knew it all. Sadly, much of what they *knew* was not so.


8 posted on 08/12/2009 7:36:10 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I was concerned that too many people were losing their virginity as teenagers. However, this is not the way I hoped to reduce the problem.


9 posted on 08/12/2009 7:37:08 PM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I was concerned that too many people were losing their virginity as teenagers. However, this is not the way I hoped to reduce the problem.


10 posted on 08/12/2009 7:37:19 PM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

School tells them to have sex, TV tells them to have sex, music tells them to have sex, movies tell them to have sex, freinds and “home boys” tell them to have sex, they don’t go to church and their parents don’t tell them anything.

Why would anyone be surprused?


11 posted on 08/12/2009 7:43:27 PM PDT by GeronL (http://unitedcitizen.blogspot -Guilty of deviationism- http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

These adults don’t watch TV?

These are the adults that don’t care if you ask me


12 posted on 08/12/2009 7:46:46 PM PDT by GeronL (http://unitedcitizen.blogspot -Guilty of deviationism- http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I think anyone with half a brain isn’t confused or misinformed about kids having sex, especially those in that “low income” area.

Sure, the sexualization of America’s kids has been ongoing to anyone that bothered to notice. It ain’t new. But again, just because something is legal or encouraged doesn’t mean it’s happening at the level that is claimed doesn’t mean everyone is doing it. Ask any teen boy how often he’s getting laid and if he’s not lying, it’s not what most of these studies would claim. Sure, more girls are having or admitting to having sex, and it’s not as “shameful” as it once was, but keep in mind what demographic is being studied. This is not new.


13 posted on 08/12/2009 7:51:09 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

It hasn’t always been so out in the open but it was happening decades ago (hell hundreds of years ago, too).

My oldest brother grew up in the 50s, was a teen in the late 50s and he had sex as a teen. It did happen back then and way before then. It wasn’t talked about.


14 posted on 08/12/2009 7:59:15 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I blame Clinton.


15 posted on 08/12/2009 7:59:46 PM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Kids from single homs tend to be left alone a lot more than those who don’t have single Mothers. Kids left with no supervision will find something to do!


16 posted on 08/12/2009 8:02:47 PM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba

That should be “single parent homes”


17 posted on 08/12/2009 8:03:42 PM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I guess we’re seeing the results of long term decline in religious faith and practice in strong families.


18 posted on 08/12/2009 8:04:34 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Kick God out of schools

Kick God out of the public square

Kick morality out of entertainment/media

Worship pedophiles as superstar “king of -————”

Give a rapist and sex-fiend freak two terms in the White House

Kick parents out of health care decisions for their minor children.

And what does it get you????

duh...

And one look at the little girls section of your local department store and you will assume that 98% of clothing designers are pedophiles - What I refer to as “hoochie momma” clothing fill the majority of shelves.

With a 5 year-old and a 3 year-old, I get rather frustrated when I am with the wife looking for clothes. You would think that the nation’s initial shock over such high-profile cases as the JonBenét Ramsey case would have turned on some lights of reason... but alas - the sexualization of children just gets worse. Any sexualization of a child is just wrong. So sad, but a picture of where we are going. It is the same sick and corrupt mentality that brings us the dominance of the liberals in politics.

And you know who’s fault it is? Everyone who calls themselves a “Christian” or who even claims to have morals - who buy the garbage anyway. How many million families in the US CLAIM to be Christian? As a pastor, I get so frustrated preaching about moral issues - then having children show up in some of this very garbage - or coming in “fashions” from soft-porn vendors like Abercrombie & Fitch who are some of the big players in not only sexualization of children (or do you turn a blind eye to the mostly naked, and often engaged in soem sort of sexual behavior so often used in their ads?), but also promote homosexual events and causes.

If every person claiming to be a “moral person”, or a Christian wouldn’t buy the junk - guess what - it would disappear, or be a lot less common.

But just like the garbage Hollywood gives us - wouldn’t be so much trash if folks didn’t buy it.


19 posted on 08/12/2009 8:41:29 PM PDT by TheBattman (Pray for our country...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Things have really “progressed”.

I remember hearing a conversation among child evangelism workers back in the mid-70s who conducted after-school bible groups, etc. They were saying that the scuttlebutt among elementary school students in the inner city went something like this:

Q: What’s a virgin?

A: An ugly 6th grader.

Looks like we have “progressed” to where, nowadays, the answer might be “an ugly 3rd or 4th grader.


20 posted on 08/12/2009 9:09:15 PM PDT by Tucker39 (I Tim. 1:15b " .....Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson